diglloyd

Welcome to diglloyd.com
In-depth review coverage is by subscription.
Also by Lloyd: MacPerformanceGuide.com and WindInMyFace.com
First-time visitor
Lloyd gets credit via these or any site ads/links... thank you!
Trusted computing vendor MacSales.com
B&H DAILY DEAL   B&H Deals by brand/category/discount
Wish lists: Sony | NIKON | ZEISS | Canon | Pentax K | Fujifilm | Leica M | Leica SL | Macs
Buy anything at Amazon.com
SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina
Deal Zone, Great Deal Every Day
View BEST Deals Right Now

Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4G VR

The new Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4G VR arrived today. As can be seen, it is significantly smaller than its f/2.8 sibling. At about $1399, it warrants serious consideration next to its about $2397 sibling if you don’t need ƒ/2.8.

The relevant distinguishing features are:

  • Performance at ƒ/4 is 80% of the optical contest for this type of lens. How well it does at ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/8 is interesting, but not primary, because ƒ/5.6 crosses the “too dark, too slow” threshold in many shooting venues, at least in my experience.
  • Effectiveness of the VR system (this does not substitute for a fast shutter since VR cannot freeze action).
  • Illumination of the frame at ƒ/4.
  • Distortion.
  • Size/weight/price, assuming it qualifies on the above basis.

My existing 2010 review of the Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II is in DAP and is worth reading for those interested in both. I’ll be adding new material for the 70-200/4, focusing on the differences between the two in terms (mainly) of optical performance.

Without the optional about $199 Nikon RT-1 tripod collar (hard to get a hold of), it’s a problem to compare the two because the f/2.8 lens mounts on its tripod collar and the camera mounts on the camera plate, causing different height and perspective. I also don't like all that weight on the lens mount of the camera; while the ƒ/4 lens is not as heavy, it is not lightweight.

As for fit and finish, I don’t know if “Made in Thailand” is responsible for the twisted rubberized grip clearly visible on the photo below. The 70-200/2.8 VR II doesn’t have this issue. I suppose it doesn’t matter optically, but it’s substandard quality that I have not seen before from Nikon.

Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II and Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4G VR
Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II and Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4G VR
Which Mac? Storage, Backup, RAID? Color Management?
✓ diglloyd consulting starts you out on solid footing.
Our trusted photo rental store

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2008-2016 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.