Just renewed my subscriptions; it’s a bargain. When I first subscribed a year ago I must admit I was not sure about your claim that reading DAP and in particular the Ziess review’s I would learn a lot about photography generally in addition to the items reviewed, but I did and then some!!! Thank you!!

I am a pro photographer, among other things, and I subscribe to a number of sites. In my view, your site is the best source of accurate, deep, and unbiased photographic information out there. You don’t mind placing criticism at any company's feet either, which is refreshing. I find the writing is simple; to the point; has the required degree of precision; and is clear. Each of the lens comparisons represents a huge amount of sheer work, and the aspects considered are those that matter to me as a photographer. Much else could be said, but what I am looking for is that balance between economy and comprehensiveness, and this site hits the mark. Your site has saved me much more than it costs, for sure. Thank you. — Kit L, Australia

I am a recent subscriber, but I have already read most of the material on your wonderful site, and stand in awe at your achievement! The thoroughness and thoughtfulness of your work puts most of the rest of similar (in goal) knowledge bases to shame! — Sergey Z

I have to say, your website is my favorite when it comes to photography. I go to it almost everyday. I have the DAP and Zeiss subscriptions and read the Blog. I am interested in learning about IR so your subscription is a must. — Augustin CR

Don't know how you manage to trounce full magazine staffs each month in total output. And in terms of the quality of that writing.....it's obviously not a fair contest! — Steve G

If it was not for your site I would not have carried out these tests to evaluate my purchase and I would have ended with a bad product, and a waste of a lot money. Thanks again and again............and again. — Saad G

I appreciate your diligence in reviewing this camera. All the other reviewers went gaga over it.

I have read a few of your reviews and they are worth every cent. — Christian F, Vienna

Thanks so much. Your blog and DAP are among my most valued information sources for photo equipment & technique. I especially appreciate your balance of subjective/objective evaluation. — Johh M

Great value in your site, and I passed that information on. You have saved me several $1000 at this point! — Steven V

You ask questions and investigate like a scientist. The right side of this photo is not in focus while left side is sharp. Why? I can't get this 50mm lens to focus at infinity- why? Why,why? You are looking at problems overlooked by other photographers. Your knowledge as a computer software engineer is a big bonus. When you talk about computers I listen very carefully. In fact, you are the only person I trust in this area. I was an advertising pro in New York for years and I can tell you that a real pro tests everything- nothing is left to chance. Every question is asked. No mistakes are allowed. You make a mistake on a job with a big agency and your career is over-done. Everyone in town will know the next day, your competitions' rep will be sure they know. Zero tolerance.— James K

Your reviews of the new Nikon PC-E lenses are most informative and greatly appreciated.— David P

I really enjoy reading your what you write. The subscription fee is really nothing, you should make it $50.— Saad G

I certainly have been enjoying your recent DAP content.— Jeff L

I wish I had invested in it sooner, I would have learnt many more things faster about these aspects.— Enric C

I decided to subscribe because I was interested in some of your articles and was sufficiently impressed by the quality of your site to be persuaded your opinion was worth paying for. This does not happen often on the web.— Frank D, subscriber

I'm looking forward to looking at your work, especially the equipment reviews and the technique information. The quality of your website and particularly the pictures which I think are outstanding advertising and the reason I subscribed.— Simon W

I have to say that Mac Pro / Optimizing Photoshop Performance article ALONE is worth the subscription!.— Jonathan S [ articles now free in MPG]

Just finished reading the focus shift article—the best coverage of that topic I've ever read - I learned quite a bit. Superb. Its something I talk about on the phone a couple of times a week with customers. — Roger at LensRentals.com

OMG!!! Thank you so much! Why? 1) I wondered why I loved my 50mm f/1.2L at first and then became less
enchanted with it... 2) When I shoot outdoors with the 14mm f/2.8 mk II I sometimes shoot with a fenceline or something leading into a corner. I wondered how the corner could be so dang sharp... That's after just browsing those two articles for 5 minutes each...thank you!!!!!!!!!!— Brian S

This is to congratulate and thank you for the technical insights you gave me through DAP and your Zeiss-tests. Being a pro photographer since 25 years I always bought the best lenses available for my Nikons and never cared too much about all those technical details. Now I learned about focus-shift and other issues, which really broadens my horizon and sharpens my awareness. Thank you and continue like this! — Rainer U, subscriber

It is a distinct honor to be the first subscriber to diglloyd’s Advanced Photography (DAP). Lloyd Chambers has shown tremendous dedication in providing unbiased, timely and accurate reports on key technologies and issues in photography through his blog, free articles and Pro Reviews. Whether a beginning photographer or life-long professional, the information the site provides is critical in creating a cost effective and efficient path forward in the digital photographic era. I know I have benefited greatly from Lloyd’s insight and knowledge, and you will too.— Pete Myers, Fine Arts Photographer, Santa Fe, NM

I have been a reader of Lloyd Chambers' blog and an extremely satisfied purchaser of his Pro Reviews. I have been a photographer, as a professional since I was 14, am now 76, and I have read just about everything I could get my hands on that relates to photography. (See the Getty Museum collection of photography, ref. Crane Collection Books,) Also, I have been a subscriber to and do read almost every photo magazine that has been published in the US. Nowhere is there any source as informative and valuable, with the most up-to-date information, re digital photography as this site. The results of Lloyd Chambers' excellent analysis of his personal and technical lens and camera tests, his site and downloaded reviews have given me knowledge that is unobtainable elsewhere, and has been for me and will be for any amateur or professional a most useful mine of fabulous and necessary information for anyone who is in any way engaged in the use of a digital camera. I can without hesitation endorse this site as a MUST for every person "out there" who owns or can borrow a digital camera. And, it is so much fun to read each day! Honestly, I can say, his daily writings are like "someone is bringing me a present each day!”— Arnold Crane, Chicago/Washington: White House News Photographers Assn WHNPA (Member): Life Member ASMP & NP

Yesterday I bought your research paper “The Sharpest Image” and found it to be filled with useful information and a few surprises. The paper is an incredible value — Lawrence B, 15 May 2008

[The Sharpest Image is just one of several previous Pro reviews now included free in DAP]

Sharpness guide is really excellent. I am definitely going to get that resolution chart and test my different tripod head/legs/lens combinations. If I've learned anything from your guides so far, it's that testing on one's own equipment is the key to understanding its limitations and improving technique. — Sterling Z, 10 January 2008

I meant to write you after reading your sharpness report to tell you how much I enjoyed it. It has changed the way that I shoot, and my results have improved because of it. — FR

Thank you once again for a quick and detailed response to my query!  The information and suggestions you make are quite helpful. I will be doing your suggested tests in the very near future. — LT, Connecticut, USA

See the concise table of contents.

Diglloyd’s Advanced Photography (DAP) is a growing collection of high quality, timely, impartial research and reports on topics of interest to professional and amateur photographers.

Please see the table of contents below by (“Contents by topic”) or by updates (“Updates”). New articles and updates to old articles are added frequently (see the Updates tab, below). The work that produces this research is funded through low-cost annual subscriptions within the reach of any photographer (more info).

A subscription enables access to all the DAP content below and any future content for the duration of the subscription (one year). Even without updates, the breadth and depth of existing content in DAP would fill several books—a tremendous value.

All content is browser-based— no downloading.

Update policy

Your subscription extends for a year into the future, giving you not only all of today’s content, but the entire next year’s worth.

A photographer’s perspective

Making real images is the focus of the vast majority of the material in DAP, with the efforts focusing on image making and the qualities that matter.

Obvious issues include resolution, noise and color rendition, but great attention is paid to issues like bokeh: how a lens draws or renders on real-world subjects.

Consistent with this approach, the number, size, and quality of images used in presenting the material is extensive and exhaustive. In a few cases deemed relevant, even RAW files are provided.

Learning not just reviews

DAP doesn’t just review cameras and lenses, it teaches along the way. Every review has areas of general photographic interest.

Some articles, like those on focus shift, are independent of brand, and focus on photography problems applicable to any brand.

Others, like the must-read The Sharpest Image, explore sharpness in ways that affect every brand, every camera, and every lens, though a small portion of the analysis is brand-specific.

Canon, Nikon and other brands

Coverage focuses on Canon EOS and Nikon, but a variety of other brands are also included; Sony, Mamiya, Hartblei, Voigtlander, Sigma, Leica and Tamron for example.

 

img
Canon 5D Mark II + 24/1.4L II
img
Nikon D3x + 200/2 VR
img
Nikon D3x

Today I got my DAP account. Wow, all that stuff and tremendously tested lenses, equipment (tripods), + techniques (The Sharpest Image). It is done so thoroughly at such a high level. It is very inspiring. I think this is the best, and most cheap “investment” in Photographic content I ever made. Profit shall be remarkable high to get better IQ based shots from what you learn out of these articles. Thank you very much. — Leon O

I am a subscriber to DAP. I gotta say, you provide good value!— Jose R

I was curious about and subscribed specifically for the Zeiss review, but have found much else of real value on your site, so although I'm not gear oriented I plan to renew annually. BTW, major selling points for me are the quality of photographs on your site (it is immediately apparent that someone with an artist's eye is making them), your knowledge of the engineering principles involved (which insures repeatable results), and the extended usage period of this review and others on your site (any purchaser likely cares about the extended result). Your site is remarkably informative and the subscription is an outstanding value.— Terrence M

Still reading your review. It is answering many questions that no one could answer for me. Thanks for all the work you put into this and being able to explain it in a clear and concise manner. — Richard

I finally subscribed to the paid service. It really IS worth it! — James N, subscriber

I had to quit reading and hit the sack last night but I was right back at it before work this AM and things were working smoothly as I moved between articles. You are very good and I appreciate what you have accomplished. I have many of the camera/lens combinations that you work with... Your research will help me with my greatest desire, to take extraordinary images...I will gain the knowledge with the help of your info and spending time behind the camera in my studio and in the field. — BL, 24 January 2006

Thanks, REALLY enjoyed your work!! — PB



 

View contents by date >

Contents by Topic


CAMERAS

Leica S2 37.5 Megapixel Medium Format DSLR

How does Leica’s medium format entry measure up in ergonomics, image quality, etc?

Canon 1D Mark IV

Canon 1D Mark IV 16-megapixel DSLR.

Nikon D3s

Nikon D3s low-light versatile DSLR.

User’s Guide and Review of the Leica M9

High resolution digital rangefinder

  1. Leica M9 Main page
  2. Leica M9 Long Term Findings New!
  3. Ergonomics and Usability
  4. Introduction to Rangefinders
  5. Composing with a rangefinder
  6. Focusing with a rangefinder
  7. Live View, image zoom, LCD
  8. Sensor Bifurcation issue
  9. Sensor Specular highlights issue
  10. Sensor Highlight Posterization
  11. Color uniformity and Lens Correction
  12. Lens Correction Examples (mostly for Zeiss)
  13. Noise
  14. Lens options for the M9
  15. Lens Coding for Lenses Without 6-bit Code
  16. Experience with Match Technical Coder Kit
  17. A lightweight kit for hiking
  18. Sharpness: f/2-f/16 Leica 28mm f/2 Summicron-M ASPH
  19. Field Curvature: Leica 24mm f/2.8 Summicron-M ASPH
  20. Analysis of 35mm Lens Choices
  21. Leica 24/3.8 Elmar-M ASPH vs 24/2.8 Elmarit-M ASPH
  22. Comparison: Leica 35/2 Summicron-M vs Zeiss ZM 35/2 Biogon
  23. Comparison: Leica 21/1.4 Summilux-M vs Zeiss 21/2.8 Distagon on D3x New!
  24. Comparison 2: Leica 35/2 Summicron-M vs Zeiss ZM 35/2 Biogon
  25. Comparison 3: Bitingly-sharp Biogon
  26. Examples: White Mountains
  27. Examples: Lee Vining Canyon
  28. Examples: Abandoned Mining Sites
  29. Examples: Other
  30. Examples 1: 50mmm f/0.95 Noctilux
  31. Examples 2: 50mmm f/0.95 Noctilux
  32. Examples: Noctilux f/0.95 Focus Series 15-frame “movie”
  33. Examples: 50mmm f/0.95 Noctilux Aberrations
  34. Examples: Alpine Creek (25mm, 75mm)
  35. Examples: Portraits with 75/2 APO
  36. Examples: Zeiss ZM 15mm f/2.8 Distagon
  37. Examples: Leica 18/3.8 Super-Elmar-M ASPH
  38. Examples: Leica 21mm f/1.4 Summilux-M ASPH
  39. Examples: Leica 21mm f/1.4 Summilux-M ASPH Bristlecones New!
  40. Examples: Leica 24mm f/1.4 Summilux-M ASPH New!
  41. Examples: Leica 24mm f/2.8 Elmarit-M ASPH
  42. Examples: Leica 28mm f/2 Summicron-M ASPH
  43. Examples: Various
  44. Lens notes: 15mm f/2.8 Distagon
  45. Lens notes: 18mm f/4 Zeiss ZM Distagon
  46. Lens notes: 21mm f/4.5 Zeiss ZM Biogon
  47. Lens notes: 21mm f/2.8 Zeiss ZM Biogon
  48. Lens notes: 35mm f/2 Zeiss ZM Biogon
  49. Lens notes: 18mm f/3.8 Super-Elmar-M ASPH
  50. Lens notes: 21mm f/1.4 Summilux-M ASPH New!
  51. Lens notes: 24mm f/1.4 Summilux-M ASPH New!
  52. Lens notes: 24mm f/2.8 Elmarit-M ASPH
  53. Lens notes: 24mm f/3.8 Elmar-M ASPH New!
  54. Lens notes: 28mm f/2 Summicron-M ASPH
  55. Comparing MTF Old-to-2010 Summilux-M 35mm /1.4 ASPH
  56. Lens notes: 35mm f/2 Leica Summicron-M ASPH
  57. Lens notes: 50mm f/0.95 Leica Noctilux-M ASPH
  58. Lens notes: 75mm f/2 APO-Summicron-M ASPH
  59. Lens notes: 85mm f/2 Zeiss ZM Sonnar
  60. Lens notes: 90mm f/2.5 Leica Summarit-M
  61. Conclusions
  62. Where to buy the Leica M9 and lenses

Sigma DP-2 with Foveon X3 sensor

Sigma DP-2 with the amazing Foveon X3 sensor. RAW file included for your own analysis.

Panasonic G-1 micro-4/3 camera

Panasonic G-1 especially compared to the Olympus E-P1. Intriguing results with RAW vs in-camera JPEG. RAW file included for your own analysis.

Olympus E-P1 micro-4/3 camera

Great image quality, but...

Canon EOS 5D Mark II review

Canon 5D Mark II impressions

Noise ×4: Nikon D3x, Nikon D3, Canon 5D Mark II, & Canon 1Ds Mark III

Noise performance of early 2009’ premier digital SLRs. ISOs from 50 through 25600, dark area noise, noise reduction effects, noise versus resolution. Can more smaller pixels beat fewer large ones?

Long exposures with Nikon D3x, D3, Canon 5D Mark II

Long exposure noise performance with the Nikon D3x, D3 and Canon 5D Mark II at ISOs from 50 through 25600.

Nikon D3x 24.4-megapixel DSLR review

Includes: D3x resolution comparisons (res chart) with Nikon D3, Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III, resolution comparison on outdoor shot with Nikon D3, large examples, large wildlife examples, Nikon 200mm f/2 VR on D3x, long exposure noise ISO series, D3x sensitivity on diffraction, D3x dynamic range at ISO 100 vs ISO 50, D3x vs D3 color and noise.

Mamiya DL28 medium format 28 megapixel system

The Mamiya DL28 offers the Mamiya 645 AFD III, the new Sekor AF 80mm f/2.8D lens and the Leaf Aptus-II 6 digital back. Image quality is outstanding and the DL28 should definitely be considered by anyone looking into medium format.

Sony A900

The 24.6 megapixel Sony A900 digital SLR is compared with Canon’ top-of-the-line 21.1MP EOS 1Ds Mark III. A field report including two comparisons with the Canon 1Ds Mark IIII, example images in color and black and white, and the Zeiss ZA 135mm f/1.8 Sonnar. Anti-Shake (SteadyShot) is assessed, as is noise behavior.

Nikon vs Canon: noise and sharpness

Nikon vs canon: Noise and Sharpness

Nikon D2x vs Canon EOS—Nikon D2x, Canon 5D, 1Ds Mark II compared, details

In-depth review on the 12MP Nikon D2x compared to the 12.8MP Canon EOS 5D and 16.7MP Canon EOS 1Ds Mark II. Resolution, field shots, dynamic range, color, long exposures, depth of field, lens evaluations, ergonomics and usability.

TECHNIQUE

Landscape Photography at Wide Apertures

Escape the banale postcard look by shooting landscapes at f/1.4 or f/0.95.

The Sharpest Image

Your guide to sharper pictures! Revealing research shows just how important tripod stability can be, and offers some surprises along the way. Analysis of tripod stability, handheld sharpness, vibration reduction, mirror lockup, shooting mode and technique, tripod comparisons, burst shooting, tripod collars and ballheads.

LENSES

Canon 800mm f/5.6L IS Super Telephoto

A review of Canon’s 800m f/5.6L IS super telephoto, with high performance that demands technical mastery to use well.

Nikon AF 16mm f/2.8D Fisheye

Exploring the 16mm fisheye for landscape photography, and correcting fisheye distortion.

Nikon AF 14mm f/2.8 versus Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G

Nikon AF 14mm f/2.8D and AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8G ED

Canon Wide Angle Prime Lenses

Comparing the 16-35mm f/2.8L II to most of Canon’s wide angle prime lenses. Optical performance, ergonomics, focus, build quality.

Nikon AF Micro Nikkor 200mm f/4.0D IF-ED

Nikon’s workhorse 200mm macro lens, and not just sharp at close-ups!

Nikon AF-S 300mm f/2.8 VR II

Nikon’s 300mm super telephoto.

Nikon AF-S 24mm f/1.4G ED

State of the art design in a fast 24mm lens. Includes full-resolution images at f/1.4.

Canon 200mm f/2L IS

A review of Canon’s 200mm f/2L mini super telephoto. Not just for sports, it makes a great landscape lens.

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II

A review of Canon’s new 70-200mm zoom, along with comparisons to other models and the 200mm f/2L IS. Extensive comparisons at multiple focal lengths.

Nikon Ultra Wide Zooms

Comparing Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR, 17-35mm f/2.8, 14-24mm f/2.8, 18-35mm, 24-70mm f/2.8 along with Nikon 20mm f/3.5, 24mm f/2, 28mm f/2, 35mm f/1.4 AIS, and more.

  1. Main Page
  2. Personal Usage Notes and Reactions
  3. Specifications and pricing
  4. Understanding Lens Performance
  5. Hazy Low Contrast with 17-35 @ f/2.8
  6. Correcting Distortion in Software
  7. Distortion at 16mm
  8. Distortion at 17mm
  9. Distortion at 21mm
  10. Distortion at 24mm
  11. Distortion at 28mm
  12. Distortion at 35mm
  13. Vignetting at 16mm
  14. Vignetting at 17mm
  15. Vignetting at 21mm
  16. Vignetting at 24mm
  17. Vignetting at 28mm
  18. Vignetting at 35mm
  19. Overview of Comparisons
  20.     Crops at 16mm — Focus
  21.     Crops at 16mm — Top Left Corner
  22.     Crops at 16mm — Right Edge
  23.     Crops at 16mm — Left Edge
  24.     Crops at 16mm — Bottom
  25.     Crops at 17mm — Focus
  26.     Crops at 17mm — Left Edge
  27.     Crops at 17mm — Top Left Corner
  28.     Crops at 17mm — Right Edge
  29.     Crops at 17mm — Bottom Right
  30.     Crops at 21mm — Focus
  31.     Crops at 21mm — Left Edge
  32.     Crops at 21mm — Top Right Corner
  33.     Crops at 21mm — Bottom
  34.     Crops at 21mm — Bottom Right Corner
  35.     Crops at 24mm — Focus
  36.     Crops at 24mm — Left Edge
  37.     Crops at 24mm — Right Edge
  38.     Crops at 24mm — Upper Left Corner
  39.     Crops at 24mm — Bottom Right
  40.     Crops at 28mm — Focus
  41.     Crops at 28mm — Left Edge
  42.     Crops at 28mm — Right Edge
  43.     Crops at 28mm — Top Left Corner
  44.     Crops at 28mm — Bottom Right Corner
  45.     Crops at 35mm — Focus
  46.     Crops at 35mm — Left Edge
  47.     Crops at 35mm — Right Edge
  48.     Crops at 35mm — Top Left Corner
  49.     Crops at 35mm — Bottom Right Corner
  50.     Conclusions on Mosaic Comparisons —
  51.     Download Full Resolution Mosaic @ f/5.6
  52. Overview of 18-35 vs 16-35
  53. Distortion of Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 vs 16-35/4 VR
  54. Vignetting of Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 vs 16-35/4 VR
  55.     18-35 vs 16-35 — Crops at 18mm
  56.     18-35 vs 16-35 — Crops at 21mm
  57.     18-35 vs 16-35 — Crops at 24mm
  58.     18-35 vs 16-35 — Crops at 28mm
  59.     18-35 vs 16-35 — Crops at 35mm
  60.     18-35 vs 16-35 — Conclusions
  61. Conclusions
  62. Where to Buy

Canon Ultra-wide Zoom Lenses: 17-40 and 16-35

Comparing the Canon 17-40mm f/4L and 16-35mm f/2.L II.

Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

Nikon bread and butter telephoto zoom

Canon 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS

Canon 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS

Canon TS-E 24/3.5L II

Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II

Canon TS-E 17/4L

Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L

Canon 24mm f/1.4L II

State of the art design in a fast ultra wide angle lens.

Hartblei 40/80/120mm SuperRotators

Medium format Zeiss glass in Hartblei precision tilt/shift lens barrels!

Nikon 24mm Lens Choices

Options for a 24mm lens: Nikon 14-24/2.8G, Nikon 24-70/2.8G, Nikon 24/2 AI-S, Nikon PC-E 24/3.5. Sharpness, distortion, flare, field curvature, shooting impression and ergonomics.

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G

Nikon’s latest 50mm lens compared with the Zeiss ZF 50/1.4, NIkon 50/1.4D and Sigma 50/1.4.

180mm Lenses for the Nikon D3x

Explores options for 180mm lenses on the Nikon D3x, including the Leica 180/2.8 APO-Elmarit-R in Nikon mount, Nikon 180/2.8 ED, Nikon 70-200/2.8 VR, Nikon 70-300/4.5-5.6 VR, and Tamron 70-200/2.8. Updated: now includes the Voigtlander 180/4 APO!

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM on Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III

The Sigma 50mm f/1.4 is a worthy contender in the crowded 50mm area. See how it performs compared to the Canon EF 50/1.4 and EF 50/1.2L.

Focus Shift In-Depth

Focus shift assesments of a wide variety of lenses of various brands. Shows a range of apertures for each lens and the mount of focus shift, discusses how to compensate for it.

28mm Shift Lenses for Nikon

In-depth review on the Nikon D2x of the Nikon 28mm f/3.5 PC-Nikkor, Nikon 28mm f/4 PC-Nikkor and the Schneider 28mm f/2.8 PC-Super-Angulon. Flare, distortion, color fringing, color rendition, sharpness, ergonomics, aligmnent, sample variation. A must-read if you’re considering the Canon or Nikon 24mm tilt/shift lenses. See also other shift lens reviews.

Shift Lenses for Nikon & Canon

Shift lens performance of Nikon/Canon/Schneider/Olympus on various cameras.

Voigtlander 20/3.5, 40/2, 58/1.4 Lenses for Nikon and Canon

In-depth review evaluates ergonomics, flare, bokeh, vignetting, focus shift, sharpness. Includes comparisons with Zeiss ZF 35/2 Distagon, Nikon 45mm f/2.8P and NOCT-Nikkor 58/1.2. Reviewed on Nikon, but now available for Canon EOS.

Special Report: Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED-IF

Evaluates performance of the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR on the Nikon D3. Comparison with the Nikon 180mm f/2.8D ED-IF.

Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II

In-depth review of the Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II including flare, distortion, field curvature, resolution charts, numerous field examples and comparison to the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G. The Canon EF 14/2.8L II is a superb lens, but with some peculiarities which may enhance or degrade its appeal for different uses. The review is as much a “user guide” as a review; even if you use this lens it’s well worth your time to read this review.

DIGITAL WORKFLOW

RAW-file Converters—Nine RAW converters compared, details

Analysis of the image quality from 9 different RAW-file converters. While there are newer versions of the converters in this review, the comparisons are still highly useful in evaluating the current versions. Both Canon and Nikon files are used for the review.


Home / Table of Contents | Terms of Use | Copyright © 2008-2010 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved. | Contact | Newsletter + Alerts | Press