Raw-file Converters
27 February 2006
Take a look at the page thumbnails to get an idea of what’s in the review. The review is a 90-megabyte download. See also the reader comments. Most photographers shooting raw do so for maximum quality, so a key question is whether any of the 3rd-party raw-file conversion programs offer superior detail while minimizing digital artifacts. Three Nikon D2X raw (NEF) files, and three Canon EOS 1Ds Mark II raw (CR2) files are used to compare the following raw converters:
I’ve used Nikon Capture since version 1.0 (starting with Nikon D1 files), and am quite familiar with its operation. I’ve also used Digital Photo Professional since version 1.0, and is am also very familiar with its operation. IMPORTANT NOTE: Apple’s Aperture is due for an upgrade (version 1.1) in March 2006. Its image quality (version 1.01) as seen in this review clearly needs improvement, though as a new entrant into the field it deserves a chance to prove itself. For that reason, final conclusions on Aperture should be deferred until version 1.1 is released. There are many aspects to a raw-file processing program, including sharpness, digital artifacts, color rendition, aberration correction, batch-processing, speed of operation, platform support, supported cameras, etc. This review considers only sharpness and digital artifacts. It is not a full-blown review of all the features in these raw converters; that would take many weeks to write, and be 10 times the size (or more). As with politics, concluding that a candidate is good or bad based on a single factor may be not be the wisest choice. In the case of raw-file converters, there almost always exist raw files for which one converter produces more pleasing results than another, whether it be resolved detail, color, or just “look”. It is not the intent of this review to conclude that one of these raw converters is best for all images, or for all photographers, each of whom has varying needs. This review is a good introduction to diglloyd reviews. The larger reviews, D2X vs EOS, The Sharpest Image, and 28mm Shift Lenses use a similar style. The review costs $14.99 USD, payable via paypal (preferred) or personal check or money order. The review is licensed to a single person only; providing it to another party in any form is prohibited—thank you for respecting the time and effort that went into preparing it. Purchase
(Download only)
Before purchasing, please check current
delivery status—responses to purchases are handled manually, and occassionally I am unable to
respond due to lack of internet access.
PLEASE READ: Within 24 hours of receiving payment, digLloyd will email you a URL and a password to download the review. You will receive this information even if you purchase the CD version. The password is usually good for 48 hours. If you run out of time, simply email info@diglloyd.com for a new password. Please note that the system for supplying the URL/password is not automated, so please do not expect an immediate response. diglloyd is in California (USA) and usually takes care of all outstanding requests by 10pm PST. For various reasons, diglloyd email is sometimes rejected. If you do not receive a response within 24 hours, check this list to see if you’re on it. Be sure to refresh your browser when viewing the page, in case it has been previously cached. SP, Souther California, 14 July 2006 BA, Kentucky, 08 January 2006 AH, location unspecified, 29 Dec 2005 JH, location unspecified, 19 Dec 2005 AH, location unspecified, 19 Dec 2005
|
||||||||
