diglloyd publication
Imagery: Auto - Large Table of Contents
Canon 200mm f/2L IS

Perspectives from Readers

Perspectives from readers of this review.

Reader Carl H

I am currently a Nikon owner and have both the 200/2 VR and 70-200/2.8 VR, so I can possibly add a comment on your conclusion page for the Canon 200/2.

I do theater and indoor sports most of my time and experience shows that under both circumstances the 70-200 is the clearly better choice. The ability to zoom is far more important than the 1 - 1.5 stops of light you get with a 200/2 (specially with the D3S). Image quality differences between the zoom and the prime are not so apparent under the sports and theater circumstances, I have done several sessions with both lenses and most of the time I can't tell which image was from which lens without looking at the EXIF. The bulk of the 200/2 is really a problem when doing theater, specially if you work with 2 bodies like I do.

Article continues for subscribers...

If you’re already a subscriber, CLICK HERE TO LOG IN

diglloyd Advanced Photography

diglloyd Advanced Photography includes hundreds of pages of exclusive coverage and high resolution, Retina-grade example pictures detailing Canon and Nikon DSLR bodies and their lenses, with in-depth analysis of sharpness and contrast, color, bokeh, vignetting, distortion, MTF, and flare. Also included is a wealth of in-context technique and workflow insight. Since 2006, diglloyd Advanced Photography is the authoritative review and on-line reference for discerning Canon and Nikon shooters. Subscriptions cost $ per year.

  1. Explore the table of contents
  2. Check out Lloyd Chambers’ Blog
  3. Subscribe today!

diglloyd Home Page | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY | Contact
Copyright © 2008-2015 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.