I hope to obtain another sample of this lens, because its behavior is just not in keeping with one can expect from a super telephoto eg a “bad sample”, the first I’ve ever experienced for a super telephoto. It is very surprising.
Assuming the 300/2.8 delivers an image at f/2.8 like it does at f/4 (and this would be expected), it should be a very satisfying choice for anyone needing f/2.8 in a 300mm.
Regrettably the bad sample problem also precluded useful findings about the Nikon 2X teleconverter.
I hope to obtain another sample to finish this review.
Article continues for subscribers...
Already a subscriber? CLICK HERE TO LOG IN
Since 2006, Diglloyd Advanced Photography is the authoritative review and reference for DSLRs and their lenses: Canon and Nikon primarily, but also Pentax and some medium format. Reviews of key DSLRs are included, but the primary focus is on lens performance. Also included is a wealth of technique and workflow approaches.
DAP includes thousands of pages of exclusive coverage and high resolution Retina-grade examples detailing Canon and Nikon DSLR bodies and their lenses, with in-depth analysis of sharpness and contrast, color, bokeh, vignetting, distortion, MTF, and flare, behavioral and practical usage.