On this page the Nikon 35mm f/1.4G is compared to the older-design Nikon 35mm f/2D (rented from LensRentals.com). One wonders just how good a lens could result if Nikon spared no effort on a new f/2 design, for similar cost? Most users do not need f/1.4 after all.
It’s critical on a target like this to evaluate performance across the frame before reaching a conclusions, not just in one or two particular areas.
Neither lens shows left/right symmetry.
The 35/1.4G is without a doubt an exceptionally high performance design, but the assembly of my copy was apparently was less than perfect. Whether symmetry matters to most users is an open issue; this is a planar target, one that is a severe challenge to any lens. Still, I deem the left edge results too blurred compared to the right edge. Some of this interacts with field curvature, but it is “off” nonetheless.
Article continues for subscribers...
If you’re already a subscriber, CLICK HERE TO LOG IN
diglloyd Advanced Photography includes hundreds of pages of exclusive coverage and high resolution, Retina-grade example pictures detailing Canon and Nikon DSLR bodies and their lenses, with in-depth analysis of sharpness and contrast, color, bokeh, vignetting, distortion, MTF, and flare. Also included is a wealth of in-context technique and workflow insight. Since 2006, diglloyd Advanced Photography is the authoritative review and on-line reference for discerning Canon and Nikon shooters. Subscriptions cost $ per year.