Left edge of frame
- At f/1.4, and f/2, the 35/1.4 produces an image twith some details, but its very soft and low contrast.
- At f/2.8, the 24-70 produces a fairly good image, and the 28-70 produce reasonably good image but with some haziness. The 17-35 has marginal detail and is low in contrast. The 35/1.4 remains very low in contrast, but has some detail.
- At f/4, the 35/1.4 stands out, with the 24-70 close behind. The 16-35 produces a low contrast image with acceptable detail. The 17-35 remains blurred and low contrast. The 28-70 shows good detail, but retains a hazy look.
- At f/5.6, the 35/1.4 and 24-70 are looking excellent. The 16-35 is still marginal, the 17-35 is worse, and the 28-70 still suffers from some haze.
- At f/8, the 24-70, 35/1.4 and 28-70 all look excellent. The 16-35 remains marginal, the 17-35 is worse.
- At f/11, the 16-35 finally cleans up, and the 17-35 finally produces an acceptable image, though it’s still the worst of the group.
Article continues for subscribers...
Already a subscriber? CLICK HERE TO LOG IN
Since 2006, Diglloyd Advanced Photography is the authoritative review and reference for DSLRs and their lenses: Canon and Nikon primarily, but also Pentax and some medium format. Reviews of key DSLRs are included, but the primary focus is on lens performance. Also included is a wealth of technique and workflow approaches.
DAP includes thousands of pages of exclusive coverage and high resolution Retina-grade examples detailing Canon and Nikon DSLR bodies and their lenses, with in-depth analysis of sharpness and contrast, color, bokeh, vignetting, distortion, MTF, and flare, behavioral and practical usage.