Left edge of frame
- At f/1.4, and f/2, the 35/1.4 produces an image twith some details, but its very soft and low contrast.
- At f/2.8, the 24-70 produces a fairly good image, and the 28-70 produce reasonably good image but with some haziness. The 17-35 has marginal detail and is low in contrast. The 35/1.4 remains very low in contrast, but has some detail.
- At f/4, the 35/1.4 stands out, with the 24-70 close behind. The 16-35 produces a low contrast image with acceptable detail. The 17-35 remains blurred and low contrast. The 28-70 shows good detail, but retains a hazy look.
- At f/5.6, the 35/1.4 and 24-70 are looking excellent. The 16-35 is still marginal, the 17-35 is worse, and the 28-70 still suffers from some haze.
- At f/8, the 24-70, 35/1.4 and 28-70 all look excellent. The 16-35 remains marginal, the 17-35 is worse.
- At f/11, the 16-35 finally cleans up, and the 17-35 finally produces an acceptable image, though it’s still the worst of the group.
Article continues for subscribers...
diglloyd Advanced Photography includes hundreds of pages of exclusive coverage and high resolution, Retina-grade example pictures detailing Canon and Nikon DSLR bodies and their lenses, with in-depth analysis of sharpness and contrast, color, bokeh, vignetting, distortion, MTF, and flare. Also included is a wealth of in-context technique and workflow insight. Since 2006, diglloyd Advanced Photography is the authoritative review and on-line reference for discerning Canon and Nikon shooters. Subscriptions cost $ per year.