Upgrade the memory of your 2020 iMac up to 128GB
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1197 $897
SAVE $300

$3498 $3498
SAVE $click

$1837 $1599
SAVE $238

$1349 $1349
SAVE $click

$250 $140
SAVE $110

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$1079 $1079
SAVE $click

$400 $400
SAVE $click

$2797 $2497
SAVE $300

$1997 $1597
SAVE $400

$1197 $897
SAVE $300

$3000 $1800
SAVE $1200

$799 $799
SAVE $click

$969 $619
SAVE $350

$2199 $1599
SAVE $600

$1798 $1098
SAVE $700

$1397 $1297
SAVE $100

Do Filters Degrade Image Quality?

See also other filter articles.

As I’ve begun to shoot more and more top-notch lenses, such as the Zeiss ZF/ZF.2/ZE lenses for Canon and Nikon, I’ve stopped using filters except when there is sand/dust and/or salt spray or similar hazards.

Especially with stellar “glass” like the Zeiss ZF/ZE line, and Leica APO lenses and Coastal Optics 60/4 APO, my working assumption has been that quality filters probably have no discernible effect, but then again they aren’t going to help things either.

Note that by “filters” I mean only the very best quality ones like the Schneider Optics B+W MRC line. Obviously, single-coated and/or primitive multi-coated filters are something I’m not going to entertain as an option, except in infrared, where single-coating is superior.

See my list of recommended filters.

The scene below shows increased veiling flare and degradation of image contrast with the filter. The filter wasn’t spotless, but most photographers would consider it clean enough to not have bothered cleaning it. So at the least, a less than pristine filter does degrade image quality.

The rollover below shows the results with and without the filter. Toggle to compare.


Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

View all handpicked deals...

Sony a7R IVA Mirrorless Camera
$3498 $3498
SAVE $click

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.