Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Handpicked deals...
$3698 $2998
SAVE $700

$2397 $1897
SAVE $500

$1199 $898
SAVE $301

$1299 $1169
SAVE $130

$4499 $3999
SAVE $500

$1399 $1099
SAVE $300

$1499 $1299
SAVE $200

$4499 $3149
SAVE $1350

$2299 $1599
SAVE $700

$2498 $2198
SAVE $300

$1799 $1379
SAVE $420

$2998 $2498
SAVE $500

$1299 $1124
SAVE $175

$2199 $1999
SAVE $200

$430 $220
SAVE $210

$3399 $2299
SAVE $1100

$6299 $3599
SAVE $2700

$398 $278
SAVE $120

$1499 $1019
SAVE $480

$1279 $719
SAVE $560

$1699 $1549
SAVE $150

Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB

Focus shift on a resolution chart

I previously reported on focus shift, and its importance when working with fast lenses (typically f/1.2 or f/1.4, but in some cases with f/2 or even f/2.8 lenses).

When testing lenses on a resolution chart (or similar high-detail subject), attention must be paid to focus shift. Shown below is an actual pixels crop, shot with the 21MP Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III and the Zeiss ZE 85mm f/1.4 Planar. Results will be the same for the Nikon-mount ZF 85/1.4 Planar. See Zeiss ZF Lenses.

Although not optimized for close-up, the Zeiss ZE 85/1.4 Planar is resolving to the limits of the sensor; it is not possible to cleanly resolve the “60” bars on the 1DsM3 at the distance this target was shot (a smidgen closer and yes it’s possible).

Contrast is low due largely to spherical aberration, which affects the image even at center, unlike other aberrations. Remarkably, corner performance is as sharp as the center (not shown). The result can be made to look much sharper with more sharpening (+3 was used in Canon’s DPP).

Actual pixels, f/1.4
(Canon 1Ds Mark III + Zeiss ZF 85/1.4 Planar)

At aperture f/2.8, depth of field partially compensates for focus shift, but leaves the image lacking contrast, though resolution is just maintained. The low contrast makes images look soft, because we perceive contrast even more than resolution. Also, the zone of sharpness will have moved to the rear of the desired focus point, possibly throwing off key subject matter, such as eyes or eyelashes. Having the inside of the eyeball sharp is of no value!

Compensating by 2cm for the focus shift (using a nodal slider), the difference in contrast is obvious, as are the clean black and whites. The zone of sharpness will be centered around the focus point as well.

Actual pixels, f/2.8. No compensation (left), 2cm compensation (right).

Note that color is also affected; except for extremely well-corrected lenses, out-of-focus means that residual color aberrations affect color, especially on high-contrast edges.

Focus shift is an issue with many lenses, but not all. Why not subscribe to DAP and get the scoop on a wide variety of lenses?

Save the tax, we pay you back, instantly!
View all handpicked deals...

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR Lens
$2397 $1897
SAVE $500

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2019 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.