Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$2699 $2199
SAVE $500

$2699 $2099
SAVE $600

$290 $203
SAVE $87

$130 $115
SAVE $15

$100 $40
SAVE $60

$3498 $3198
SAVE $300

$2347 $1897
SAVE $450

$1297 $1097
SAVE $200

$597 $497
SAVE $100

$2297 $1997
SAVE $300

$699 $499
SAVE $200

$60 $40
SAVE $20

$1699 $1199
SAVE $500

$1997 $1097
SAVE $900

$1499 $1379
SAVE $120

$372 $247
SAVE $125

$9999 $2999
SAVE $7000

$4500 $3500
SAVE $1000

$1000 $500
SAVE $500

$1398 $898
SAVE $500

$935 $549
SAVE $386

$309 $259
SAVE $49

$1300 $900
SAVE $400

$450 $280
SAVE $170

$700 $600
SAVE $100

$2000 $1270
SAVE $730

$1499 $779
SAVE $720

$450 $120
SAVE $330

$3998 $3498
SAVE $500

$150 $80
SAVE $70

$369 $175
SAVE $194

$1699 $1199
SAVE $500

$649 $449
SAVE $200

$1498 $998
SAVE $500

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$1099 $999
SAVE $100

$400 $300
SAVE $100

$7697 $4997
SAVE $2700

Mac OS X 10.5.7: hidden changes

I had put together a short piece on Photoshop filter speed (not yet published), and the scalability across multiple CPU cores. Yesterday, I completed various benchmarks, using Mac OS X 10.5.6, the same day Apple released the 10.5.7 update.

Today, I updated to Mac OS X 10.5.7. All the test numbers changed! And not by small amounts, and not always for the better.

I had previously written When More is Less, showing that disabling half the CPUs could dramatically speed up certain Photoshop operations on a dual-CPU Mac Pro Nehalem. Well, that gap has narrowed considerably; the disabling trick still improves matters, but only by a small amount.

Clearly the Apple elves have been at work, because various Photoshop filter tests on my dual-CPU (16 virtual core) Mac Pro Nehalem now run a smidgen faster with all 16 virtual cores, or a lot slower with some cores disabled, as compared to 10.5.6. As they say on the internet, WTF?!!

I don’t have a single-CPU Mac Pro Nehalem, so I don’t know if those users are, as they say, screwed by 10.5.7. Probably not, disabling installed CPUs is not the same as not having them to start with, but it’s certainly possible.

I rebooted a couple of times, and double-checked my findings—same deal. I’m seeing up to twice as slow execution time with some Photoshop filters when some CPUs are disabled, as compared to Mac OS X 10.5.6.

Does this matter?

Probably not for normal users, who won’t ever disable CPU cores. But it shows that loose screws are rattling around inside Mac OS X, not exactly confidence inspiring. The numbers should not have changed unless Apple changed the way OS X schedules CPUs/threads.

We can hope that Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6) will be a lot more intelligent about “scheduling” CPU cores and/or in the efficiency of related matters (synchronization efficiency, memory allocation, pinning threads to a core, etc).

Bottom line: Mac Pro Nehalem dual-CPU systems are probably better off with 10.5.7, but test your own system under 10.5.6 before upgrading to 10.5.7, just to be sure you’re not getting a downgrade. I should have cloned my system onto a backup drive using the Voyager Q first; at this point it’s way too much work to create a 10.5.6 system again.


Best Deals, Updated Weekly

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.