Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Upgrade the memory of your 2020 iMac up to 128GB
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1199 $779
SAVE $420

$250 $200
SAVE $50

$1699 $1299
SAVE $400

$1499 $1149
SAVE $350

$200 $140
SAVE $60

$89 $69
SAVE $20

$120 $35
SAVE $85

$178 $148
SAVE $30

$3498 $2998
SAVE $500

$3699 $1299
SAVE $2400

$1000 $700
SAVE $300

$3899 $1499
SAVE $2400

$748 $648
SAVE $100

$2999 $1999
SAVE $1000

$1699 $999
SAVE $700

$1698 $1398
SAVE $300

$4499 $4499
SAVE $click

$1399 $1049
SAVE $350

$1149 $799
SAVE $350

$1399 $1049
SAVE $350

$1498 $1198
SAVE $300

$2797 $2597
SAVE $200

$280 $250
SAVE $30

$1699 $1299
SAVE $400

$8399 $7599
SAVE $800

$899 $799
SAVE $100

$1499 $1499
SAVE $click

$1699 $1299
SAVE $400

OWC Envoy Express

World’s first Thunderbolt 3 M.2 NVME SSD enclosure.

Super fast, bus-powered, 3.3 oz, DIY easy, rugged and compact!


See also OWC Express 4M2
√ No more slow and noisy hard drives!

Mac OS X 10.5.7: hidden changes

I had put together a short piece on Photoshop filter speed (not yet published), and the scalability across multiple CPU cores. Yesterday, I completed various benchmarks, using Mac OS X 10.5.6, the same day Apple released the 10.5.7 update.

Today, I updated to Mac OS X 10.5.7. All the test numbers changed! And not by small amounts, and not always for the better.

I had previously written When More is Less, showing that disabling half the CPUs could dramatically speed up certain Photoshop operations on a dual-CPU Mac Pro Nehalem. Well, that gap has narrowed considerably; the disabling trick still improves matters, but only by a small amount.

Clearly the Apple elves have been at work, because various Photoshop filter tests on my dual-CPU (16 virtual core) Mac Pro Nehalem now run a smidgen faster with all 16 virtual cores, or a lot slower with some cores disabled, as compared to 10.5.6. As they say on the internet, WTF?!!

I don’t have a single-CPU Mac Pro Nehalem, so I don’t know if those users are, as they say, screwed by 10.5.7. Probably not, disabling installed CPUs is not the same as not having them to start with, but it’s certainly possible.

I rebooted a couple of times, and double-checked my findings—same deal. I’m seeing up to twice as slow execution time with some Photoshop filters when some CPUs are disabled, as compared to Mac OS X 10.5.6.

Does this matter?

Probably not for normal users, who won’t ever disable CPU cores. But it shows that loose screws are rattling around inside Mac OS X, not exactly confidence inspiring. The numbers should not have changed unless Apple changed the way OS X schedules CPUs/threads.

We can hope that Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6) will be a lot more intelligent about “scheduling” CPU cores and/or in the efficiency of related matters (synchronization efficiency, memory allocation, pinning threads to a core, etc).

Bottom line: Mac Pro Nehalem dual-CPU systems are probably better off with 10.5.7, but test your own system under 10.5.6 before upgrading to 10.5.7, just to be sure you’re not getting a downgrade. I should have cloned my system onto a backup drive using the Voyager Q first; at this point it’s way too much work to create a 10.5.6 system again.

OWC Envoy Pro EX SSD
Blazingly fast Thunderbolt 3 SSD!

Up to 4TB capacity, USB-C compatible.

USB-C model also available


Great for travel or for desktop!
OWC Accelsior 4M2 PCIe SSD
6000 MB/sec!
Mac or PC.


Ideal for Lightroom, Photoshop, video.
Capacity up to 16TB!
OWC Thunderblade Thunderbolt 3 SSD

Blazing fast, up to 16TB.

YEE HAH!



√ No more slow and noisy hard drives!

Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo
View all handpicked deals...

LG UM7370PUA 70" Class HDR 4K UHD Smart LED TV
$1199 $779
SAVE $420

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.