Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Upgrade the memory of your 2018 Mac mini up to 64GB
Handpicked deals...
$50 $25
SAVE $25

$7 $7
SAVE $0

$1480 $1230
SAVE $250

$3999 $2499
SAVE $1500

$1498 $1098
SAVE $400

$2897 $1797
SAVE $1100

$399 $349
SAVE $50

$899 $699
SAVE $200

$3297 $1897
SAVE $1400

$749 $499
SAVE $250

$799 $567
SAVE $232

$870 $749
SAVE $121

$3499 $2199
SAVE $1300

$3599 $2299
SAVE $1300

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

$748 $598
SAVE $150

$899 $699
SAVE $200

$799 $729
SAVE $70

$3599 $2299
SAVE $1300

$3499 $2199
SAVE $1300

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

$1997 $897
SAVE $1100

$3099 $2499
SAVE $600

$2799 $2199
SAVE $600

$4999 $4599
SAVE $400

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

Save Big $$$$ on Memory for 2019 Mac Pro

Up to 65% better pricing than Apple

Lloyd recommends 32GB RDIMM modules for most users (more expensive LRDIMMS are for 512GB or more).


Exploiting the Sensor Resolution: Depth of Field on the Nikon D800E

To obtain full sharpness from the sensor of the Nikon D800 / D800E, one must think in terms of the photosite size when depth of field is considered.

The D800 and D800E have 4.88-micron photosites, which means that to fully exploit the sharpness of the sensor, a 5-micron calculation for depth of field is in order. More than that, and resolving power rapidly falls below the sensor resolution. Which is inevitable for many photographs, but worth bearing in mind when one considers which portions of the subject really need to be sharpest.

The conventional 30-micron circle of confusion used for depth of field calculations is a blur circle 36 times larger than a 5-micron COC, or about 1-megapixel of detail. Which is not exactly 36.

Zeiss 15mm f/2.8 Distagon depth of field

As shown below for the Zeiss 15mm f/2.8 Distagon, observe that at f/8 with the lens focused at infinity, peak sharpness extends from 5.93 meters (19 feet) to infinity. And this is with a 15mm lens, an extreme wide angle! Thus dies the fable of “huge depth of field”.

The notion of the “hyperfocal distance” to balance depth of field is not something I have found to be useful. Rather, it is typically destructive to the intent of the photograph. It is better to give peak sharpness to the most important part of the subject, not to blindly set focus to some random intermediary point, which might not even have anything of interest, or might be thin-air.

The take-away here is simple: precise focus is needed to obtain full resolution from a 36-megapixel DSLR, even stopped down. Consider photographic intent, and focus appropriately, sacrificing sharpness for some portion of the subject in order to emphasize it elsewhere.

Note also that theoretical depth of field is often much less than reality, due to optical aberrations. The Zeiss 15/2.8 Distagon is one lens delivers most of what is promised by calculations.

See Making Sharp Images for much more on similar topics.

Click to view a larger table.

Depth of Field for the Zeiss 15mm f/2.8 Distagon — conventional 30-micron vs 5-micron COC
Table courtesy of Carl Zeiss
New Mac Pro?

Or iMac 5K or iMac Pro?
Consult with Lloyd ASAP before buying!


System configuration for CPU, GPU, memory, SSD, backup, RAID, optimizing performance, workflow.
For YOUR optimal workflow

Avoid costly mistakes in throwing money at the problem for less performance and/or buying the wrong machine for your own needs!

Remote screen sharing available for RAID, software configuration, etc.

More about 2019 Mac Pro vs iMac 5K vs iMac Pro...


Our trusted photo rental store
View all handpicked deals...

Pelican ProGear 1810 LED Keychain Light (Blue)
$7 $7
SAVE $0

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2019 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.