Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB
Handpicked deals...
$50 $25
SAVE $25

$7 $7
SAVE $0

$1480 $1230
SAVE $250

$3999 $2499
SAVE $1500

$1498 $1098
SAVE $400

$2897 $1797
SAVE $1100

$399 $349
SAVE $50

$899 $699
SAVE $200

$3297 $1897
SAVE $1400

$749 $499
SAVE $250

$799 $567
SAVE $232

$870 $749
SAVE $121

$3499 $2199
SAVE $1300

$3599 $2299
SAVE $1300

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

$748 $598
SAVE $150

$899 $699
SAVE $200

$799 $729
SAVE $70

$3599 $2299
SAVE $1300

$3499 $2199
SAVE $1300

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

$1997 $897
SAVE $1100

$3099 $2499
SAVE $600

$2799 $2199
SAVE $600

$4999 $4599
SAVE $400

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

Save Big $$$$ on Memory for 2019 Mac Pro

Up to 65% better pricing than Apple

Lloyd recommends 32GB RDIMM modules for most users (more expensive LRDIMMS are for 512GB or more).


Reader Comment: Autofocus Accuracy

Ismail N writes:

D4 & D800 AF and 35 1.4G fine focus adjust and (Nikon) AF in general—

I have found exactly as you do in your comments re Nikon AF and its inability to focus properly with fast lenses.

* There are only two deterministic events in the AF system - the transition points into and out of the AF zone of focus - where the AF system deems focus to be achieved.

* With fast lenses (f/2 or faster) this AF zone is actually wider than the depth of field, let alone the zone of sharpest focus. Therefore, when using a fast lens (in MF mode) it is possible without changing anything other than the focus ring position to take a shot which is front focused, in focus, and back focused all which the AF system indicate as being 'in focus'.

* The AF system simply seems to place focus somewhere within this 'AF zone' leading to incorrect focus with fast lenses.

* With manual lenses (such as some f/2 Zeiss zf2 lenses I have) it is possible to skew the AF fine tuning value so that one of the two deterministic events mentioned above in the AF (I chose the transition into the AF zone turning from camera) falls sufficiently within the 'AF zone' so that it can reasonably consistently indicate sharp focus.

* with AF lenses, the best that can be achieved is to fine tune the lens so that front focus occurs equally as often as back focus. This can further be helped by using AF-C so that the system hunts within the AF zone and success rate is increased.

As distance increases so do the errors.

The AF system is simply incapable of correctly determining focus with fast lenses. The issue exists with 1.8 lenses as well, it's simply worse with 1.4 lenses.

I switched to Nikon this year but how has this gone unnoticed for so long?

And your emphasis on sharp focus and focus shift (beyond f/2.8 which I had previously ignored) has improved performance obtained from my 14-24 in particular - thanks!

DIGLLOYD: It has not gone unnoticed by me and has made me rather grumpy about the whole matter when shooting in the field— and I’ve been reporting on it for years. People see what they want to see, and often test incorrectly (e.g. a high contrast black and white chart at close range, a fast telephoto extrapolating to a short fast lens, etc).

Gunnar P writes:

On the topic of D4 vs. D800 and Roy P’s view on autofocus accuracy. Not surprised that Roy thinks D4 has better AF even though officially AF systems are "the same".

I owned the D3S. (I sold it recently). It was a heavy but ergonomically unbelievably pleasing. Most importantly, I almost never had an out of focus image. I take a lot of pics of my kids who are "fast moving objects". In a series of 10 frames, maybe the first two were unsharp but then AF locked on and I always had tack sharp results.

With my D800, this is now different. And I am not talking about small errors that are visible due to to higher resolution. I am talking about a very high rate of "throw away" pictures that are very, very unsharp. And it is clearly an AF issue -- when the d800 locks on -- e.g., me doing a manual focus on my zeiss lens - the results are amazing.

No matter whether I use 2.8 pro zoom lenses or my beloved 28-300 -- the D800 AF produces a good amount of through away pics even though AF seemingly "locked on". There seem to be many moments of back/front focus situations, irrespective of the lens. I am only avoiding this in MF mode but that just doesn't work with moving kids.

So, I am now waiting for a D4X .

DIGLLOYD: Nikon autofocus is the pits in the real world from what I can tell from my use in the field. I’ve had far better luck with Canon autofocus on the 5D Mark III and 1D X. Shooting black and white charts to test AF is photographic masturbation. Getting focus accurate in the field on real subjects is the real deal and while I’m not going to go “prove” it, in my repeated experience, Nikon autofocus is screwed in the field on real subjects. But since I almost always use manual focus (preferably with Zeiss lenses), I have an alternative that works for me.

New Mac Pro?

Or iMac 5K or iMac Pro?
Consult with Lloyd ASAP before buying!


System configuration for CPU, GPU, memory, SSD, backup, RAID, optimizing performance, workflow.
For YOUR optimal workflow

Avoid costly mistakes in throwing money at the problem for less performance and/or buying the wrong machine for your own needs!

Remote screen sharing available for RAID, software configuration, etc.

More about 2019 Mac Pro vs iMac 5K vs iMac Pro...


MacPerformanceGuide.com
View all handpicked deals...

Pelican ProGear 1810 LED Keychain Light (Blue)
$7 $7
SAVE $0

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2019 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.