img img img img img img img img img img
Welcome to diglloyd.com
In-depth review coverage is by subscription.
Also by Lloyd: MacPerformanceGuide.com and WindInMyFace.com
First-time visitor
In Motion There is Great Potential
OWC Factory Sealed MacBook Pro
2016 MacBook Pro not a good fit?
Up to $850 off 2014 and 2015 models
16GB memory + 1TB SSD
Factory sealed reburbished with Apple 1 year warranty
ends in 4 days

Image Quality From Olympus OMD E-M5 (or Sigma DP Merrill, or any small sensor)

In assessing the image quality I’m seeing recently from the Olympus OM-D E-M5 under controlled conditions (ditto for the Sigma DP1 Merrill), I have to say that quality can be very high with proper exposure, on par with most DSLRs.

It has become clear that many of my field shots the E-M5 deemed to have a “correct” exposure could have accepted a full stop, perhaps as much as two stops more exposure in some cases. I would say that 80% of the images could have accepted at least a full stop more exposure, the exceptions being high contrast images with bright highlights and dark shadows. A full stop means a noise difference of 1.4X, two stops means noise is cut in half.

The foregoing is true even though I almost always shoot manually using ETTR techniques and add exposure over and above the camera recommendation.

The problem is that the Olympus E-M5 is so misleading in its histogram that a wholesale reevaluation of technique with the E-M5 should be on the menu for any E-M5 shooter: the E-M5 tends to badly underexpose, even if the image looks reasonably exposed; the sensor can accept a lot more exposure, and then deliver much superior image quality (shooting RAW is mandatory of course).

This underexposure behavior does not seem to be peculiar to the Olympus E-M5.

I have observed the behavior extensively in the field (not just the Dolls scene).

Why is the exposure so poor? Perhaps because camera vendors tune metering to JPEG shooters, polluting the menus and controls with JPEG-related dreck, including the all important histogram. With conservative exposure, a JPEG avoids blowing out. But as the pair of images below shows, the best exposure for RAW will badly blow-out the JPEG. Hence sub-optimal exposure for RAW, with up to twice the noise (or more) than need be (mitigated by JPEG, which blurs away fine details like noise!).

Accordingly, my future camera assessments from now on will include an assesment of how much exposure the sensor can take, versus what the camera histogram claims is full exposure.

The really good news is that by maximizing “signal to noise”, very high image quality can be obtained from small sensor cameras. Of course it is not sensor size per se— a future 60 megapixel DSLR with tiny relatively noisy photosites would be in the same boat.

Leica 50mm f/2 APO-Summicron-M ASPH  Leica 50mm f/2 APO-Summicron-M ASPH
RAW capture (left)
Simultaneous camera JPEG capture (right)
SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2008-2016 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.