Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$4499 $3499
SAVE $1000

$1398 $898
SAVE $500

$649 $449
SAVE $200

$7595 $5995
SAVE $1600

$799 $499
SAVE $300

$2598 $2398
SAVE $200

$700 $500
SAVE $200

$1498 $1398
SAVE $100

$249 $219
SAVE $30

$1699 $1349
SAVE $350

$21999 $19999
SAVE $2000

$8399 $7599
SAVE $800

$1149 $799
SAVE $350

$260 $180
SAVE $80

$4998 $3998
SAVE $1000

$569 $519
SAVE $50

$899 $799
SAVE $100

$2347 $1997
SAVE $350

$883 $633
SAVE $250

$1299 $949
SAVE $350

$1699 $1349
SAVE $350

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

Upgrade the memory of your 2018 Mac mini up to 64GB
OWC Thunderblade Thunderbolt 3 SSD

Blazing fast, up to 16TB.


√ No more slow and noisy hard drives!

Image Quality From Olympus OMD E-M5 (or Sigma DP Merrill, or any small sensor)

In assessing the image quality I’m seeing recently from the Olympus OM-D E-M5 under controlled conditions (ditto for the Sigma DP1 Merrill), I have to say that quality can be very high with proper exposure, on par with most DSLRs.

It has become clear that many of my field shots the E-M5 deemed to have a “correct” exposure could have accepted a full stop, perhaps as much as two stops more exposure in some cases. I would say that 80% of the images could have accepted at least a full stop more exposure, the exceptions being high contrast images with bright highlights and dark shadows. A full stop means a noise difference of 1.4X, two stops means noise is cut in half.

The foregoing is true even though I almost always shoot manually using ETTR techniques and add exposure over and above the camera recommendation.

The problem is that the Olympus E-M5 is so misleading in its histogram that a wholesale reevaluation of technique with the E-M5 should be on the menu for any E-M5 shooter: the E-M5 tends to badly underexpose, even if the image looks reasonably exposed; the sensor can accept a lot more exposure, and then deliver much superior image quality (shooting RAW is mandatory of course).

This underexposure behavior does not seem to be peculiar to the Olympus E-M5.

I have observed the behavior extensively in the field (not just the Dolls scene).

Why is the exposure so poor? Perhaps because camera vendors tune metering to JPEG shooters, polluting the menus and controls with JPEG-related dreck, including the all important histogram. With conservative exposure, a JPEG avoids blowing out. But as the pair of images below shows, the best exposure for RAW will badly blow-out the JPEG. Hence sub-optimal exposure for RAW, with up to twice the noise (or more) than need be (mitigated by JPEG, which blurs away fine details like noise!).

Accordingly, my future camera assessments from now on will include an assessment of how much exposure the sensor can take, versus what the camera histogram claims is full exposure.

The really good news is that by maximizing “signal to noise”, very high image quality can be obtained from small sensor cameras. Of course it is not sensor size per se— a future 60 megapixel DSLR with tiny relatively noisy photosites would be in the same boat.

RAW capture (left)
Simultaneous camera JPEG capture (right)
OWC Envoy Pro EX SSD
Blazingly fast Thunderbolt 3 SSD!

Up to 4TB capacity, USB-C compatible.

USB-C model also available

Great for travel or for desktop!
OWC Accelsior 4M2 PCIe SSD
6000 MB/sec!
Mac or PC.

Ideal for Lightroom, Photoshop, video.
Capacity up to 16TB!
View all handpicked deals...

Sony Alpha a7 II Mirrorless Digital Camera (Body Only)
$1398 $898
SAVE $500

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.