Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB
Handpicked deals...
$1799 $1299
SAVE $500

$719 $250
SAVE $469

$150 $150
SAVE $0

$795 $344
SAVE $451

$1997 $897
SAVE $1100

$1100 $900
SAVE $200

$348 $278
SAVE $70

$3099 $2499
SAVE $600

$2099 $1799
SAVE $300

$275 $275
SAVE $0

$699 $499
SAVE $200

$1699 $1299
SAVE $400

$2999 $2599
SAVE $400

$1699 $1443
SAVE $256

$2798 $2498
SAVE $300

$2399 $2199
SAVE $200

$3798 $1898
SAVE $1900

$2840 $2498
SAVE $342

$2497 $1997
SAVE $500

$2498 $1798
SAVE $700

$3297 $1997
SAVE $1300

$2798 $2498
SAVE $300

$2998 $2498
SAVE $500

$1398 $1198
SAVE $200

$898 $798
SAVE $100

$300 $300
SAVE $0

$1299 $939
SAVE $360

$4499 $2999
SAVE $1500

$4999 $4599
SAVE $400

$2199 $1999
SAVE $200

$2799 $2349
SAVE $450

$3099 $2499
SAVE $600

$2016 $1298
SAVE $718

$249 $149
SAVE $100

$2844 $2297
SAVE $547

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$2019 $1399
SAVE $620

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$348 $278
SAVE $70

Zeiss 15mm f/2.8 Distagon vs Nikon 14-24/2.8 Under Difficult Lighting (Flare)

See the review of the Zeiss 15mm f/2.8 Distagon in Guide to Zeiss.

Stephen F (https://www.time-for-inspiration.de) writes:

Do you remember our discussion of the ZF 2.8/15. Let me entertain you with the followup. ;-)

After consulting your review and re-thinking many times, I didn't find a reason to keep the Zeiss.

Even though I've made the best pics of my life with it and I really loved the rendering of the lens, I made the brain decision (why spend so much money if it doesn't bring clear advantages, blabla….). As always with decisions driven by brain (not heart), it turned out to be wrong.

I ebayed my ZF 2.8/15 to someone who knows nothing about floating elements (he thought that the inner movement was a defect, he didn't believe me and emailed Zeis for confirmation ;-))

A few months later, February in Greenland, 40° Celsius below zero, I experienced the point where the Zeiss has a huge advantage over the Nikkor.

As I did with the Zeiss, I went into extreme back-lit situations, really nice stuff. Really hard work for every lens. The Nikkor (as would nearly every other lens) ruined virtually every shot because it rendered fireworks of different disturbing lens flares.

The most strange thing was a diagonal violet beam across the whole image, coming from the sun in the picture.

From last summer I knew that the Zeiss handled those situations with frightening perfection. So, there was the difference between the Lenses, there was the clear reason In needed. I've re-purchased the Zeiss and I'm very happy with it... Currently back in Greenland with the ZF 2.8/15 and it's unique rendering.

BUT, there is a new fact which lets me bang my head against the wall. Zeiss has a dedicated polarizer for the lens (now available, it wasn't last summer), a very expensive one. Crazily expensive. The frame of this Polarizer is so thick (around 1cm) that it leads to visible vignetting in the corners.

A dedicated Polarizer which is promoted as (unique) selling point for this lens - and it's vignetting because of the overly thick frame. This is so weird. Others provide slim frames for wide angle lenses, Zeiss provides an extra-thick frame. I am eagerly awaiting the response from Zeiss concerning this fail.

DIGLLOYD: Flare control is indeed excellent.

As for the Zeiss 95mm polarizer, it does have some vignetting in the extreme corners when stopped down a bit. It’s minor, but I suspect the design was not made without a reason.


MacPerformanceGuide.com
View all handpicked deals...

Dell UltraSharp 27 U2717D 27" 16:9 InfinityEdge IPS Monitor
$719 $250
SAVE $469

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2019 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.