Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Handpicked deals...
$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

$3499 $2199
SAVE $1300

$2399 $2159
SAVE $240

$1499 $1148
SAVE $351

$590 $472
SAVE $118

$1299 $997
SAVE $302

$1199 $1015
SAVE $184

$1480 $1230
SAVE $250

$3999 $2499
SAVE $1500

$1498 $1098
SAVE $400

$2897 $1797
SAVE $1100

$399 $399
SAVE $0

$899 $699
SAVE $200

$3297 $1897
SAVE $1400

$749 $499
SAVE $250

$799 $567
SAVE $232

$870 $749
SAVE $121

$3499 $2199
SAVE $1300

$3599 $2399
SAVE $1200

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

$748 $598
SAVE $150

$899 $699
SAVE $200

$799 $729
SAVE $70

$3599 $2399
SAVE $1200

$3499 $2199
SAVE $1300

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

$1997 $897
SAVE $1100

$3099 $2499
SAVE $600

$2799 $2199
SAVE $600

$4999 $4599
SAVE $400

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB
Save Big $$$$ on Memory for 2019 Mac Pro

Up to 65% better pricing than Apple

Lloyd recommends 32GB RDIMM modules for most users (more expensive LRDIMMS are for 512GB or more).


iPhone 5s vs Nokia Lumia 1020 Camera Phones (Oversampling and Downsampling)

I’ve written about the benefits of oversampling to improve image quality: cameras today ideally would be be utilizing ultra high resolution sensors and delivering 3/4, 2/3 and 1/2 linear resolution images all but free of digital artifacts. For example, a full-frame Nikon or Canon 96 megapixel sensor delivering 72 or 48 or 36 megapixel raw images.

We can put the oversampling theory to a test with camera phones.

iPhone 5s: 3264 X 2448, 8.0 megapixels, ~2.6 MB JPEG
Nokia Lumia 1020: 7136 X 5360, 38.2 megapixels, ~11.6 MB JPEG

I don’t have a Nokia Lumia 1020 and my iPhone 5s is on order, but over at dpreview.com is a studio comparison of the iPhone 5s versus the Nokia Lumia 1020. I was curious to compare the image quality (I have asked Nokia for a review camera, but I don’t know if they will provide one).

It’s a shame that raw format is not available from both cameras, though Martin D points out that Digital Negative for iPhone / iPad offers a DNG capability.

Examining each JPEG:

  • The Nokia image shows poor contrast on the left side. Whether this is lighting I cannot say, but it looks suspiciously like lighting that changed, perhaps due to camera distance to the target. Or it might just be a camera phone weakness.
  • Color and contrast are better with the iPhone 5s than the Nokia 1020.
  • The Nokia Lumia 1020 has more than 4X as many megapixels which is more than 2X the resolving power (in pure numbers terms). It is obviously superior in detail resolution but only in the central 3/4 of the frame; it degrades markedly outside that area, so much so that it becomes inferior to the iPhone from about frame edges to corners.
  • Downsampling the Nokia Lumia 1020 image to the same resolution as the iPhone 5s image produces markedly superior definition that trounces the iPhone, but only in the central 3/4 of the frame.
  • While strong centrally, the Nokia Lumia 1020 has blurred and smeared corners. The iPhone 5s offers consistent quality corner to corner, but much lower peak sharpness due to its modest 8 megapixel sensor resolution that produces moiré and other unpleasant digital artifacts.
  • Both cameras show pincushion distortion.

A small crop (fair use) from from the dpreview test shots is shown below, the Nokia Lumia 1020 image being downsampled to match the iPhone 5s resolution. Observe that the Nokia Lumia 1020 offers a clean and crisp image on the concentric rings. It is a strong demonstration of the benefits of downsampling a high resolution sensor to a lower resolution: the digital artifacts disappear. With the iPhone 5s, very strong moiré effects develop, and the color-on-color areas fare badly.

Matched size from Nokia Lumia 1020 (left) and Apple iPhone 5s (right)

Printed

I printed both images at full resolution to a 13 X 19 inch print, using the Canon PIXMA Pro-100 on Semi Glossy paper.

My wife immediately gravitated to the iPhone 5s image because of its superior contrast and color. I am in agreement, except that the Nokia 1020 image shows considerably better definition over the central area with very fine lines and text crisply rendered, as shown above.

What is quite impressive: the 13 X 19 print quality I will summarize as “99% of the public will be dazzled”. While camera phone usability is horrible (no grip, no control over exposure, no raw, no nothin'), the market for low end cameras is clearly doomed, with sales in 2013 already tanked and that part of the market to be obliterated by camera phones within a year.

The open question is whether the contrast and color seen with the Nokia Lumia 1020 are due to the test conditions, or whether this is a general weakness, meaning a strength in favor of the iPhone. Even after making some adjustments, the iPhone image looks better overall. And since most camera phone shooters are not going to be doing Levels and Curves and sharpening in Photoshop, it’s dubious whether such adjustments are 'proper' for comparing. Bottom line: in spite of the lower resolution, the iPhone 5s camera is going to make a lot of people very, very happy.

New Mac Pro?

Or iMac 5K or iMac Pro?
Consult with Lloyd ASAP before buying!


System configuration for CPU, GPU, memory, SSD, backup, RAID, optimizing performance, workflow.
For YOUR optimal workflow

Avoid costly mistakes in throwing money at the problem for less performance and/or buying the wrong machine for your own needs!

Remote screen sharing available for RAID, software configuration, etc.

More about 2019 Mac Pro vs iMac 5K vs iMac Pro...


Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo
View all handpicked deals...

Apple 15.4" MacBook Pro with Touch Bar (Mid 2018, Space Gray)
$3499 $2199
SAVE $1300

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2019 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.