Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Memory Upgrades for 2019 Mac Pro - Save Up to 65% vs Factory Costs
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$80 $25
SAVE $55

$3198 $1798
SAVE $1400

$2799 $2099
SAVE $700

$199 $129
SAVE $70

$140 $100
SAVE $40

$699 $549
SAVE $150

$4499 $2649
SAVE $1850

$1699 $1199
SAVE $500

$5999 $5499
SAVE $500

$181 $141
SAVE $40

$7699 $7199
SAVE $500

$4499 $2649
SAVE $1850

$400 $330
SAVE $70

$4499 $2649
SAVE $1850

$4999 $4599
SAVE $400

$2350 $1950
SAVE $400

$1700 $1300
SAVE $400

$799 $699
SAVE $100

$200 $160
SAVE $40

$1997 $897
SAVE $1100

$250 $110
SAVE $140

$1398 $898
SAVE $500

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$3999 $2499
SAVE $1500

$200 $170
SAVE $30

$3999 $2499
SAVE $1500

$1498 $1398
SAVE $100

$2497 $1897
SAVE $600

$748 $598
SAVE $150

$899 $699
SAVE $200

Fujifilm GFX + 120mm f/4 Macro: Focus Shift Summarized with Two Additional Proofs

See my Fujifilm GFX wish list.

A few days ago I reported an a stupefying focus shift problem with the Fujifilm GF 120mm f/4 Macro R LM OIS WR. I have now summarized my thoughts on the behavior:

Focus Shift Behavior of Fujifilm GFX + Fujifilm GF 120mm f/4 Macro

Although I observed exactly the same behavior in other series that same day as with the Baseball Diamond fiasco, I elected to confirm it with two other subjects on a subsequent day. In my review of the Fujifilm GFX system in Medium Format I’ve added two new studies (first two listed) which all confirm each other irrefutably:

Fujifilm GF 120mm f/4 Macro Aperture Series: Rodin Burghers of Calais

Fujifilm GF 120mm f/4 Macro Aperture Series: Mosaic

Fujifilm GF 120mm f/4 Macro Aperture Series: Baseball Diamond

Fujifilm GF 120mm f/4 Macro Aperture Series @ 1:10: Dolls

I am not happy to see the launch of a new system tainted by what I deem a non-starter, but there you have it. There is some slim hope that this is a camera issue (see my discussion), but that faint hope must wait until I receive a replacement GFX and a replacement 120mm f/4. Along with what I consider serious operational problems and a host of other irritations, I feel disappointed.

Update 28 March: I have reproduced the behavior with a brand new 120mm f/4 and a brand new GFX. This disproves any “bad sample” theory. I suspect an electronic glitch bug between camera and lens, though its impossible to say. I cannot say if this is only an issue with the 120mm, or a general one, though based on some other unexplained behavior I suspect that it is a general one that may manifest more subtly with other lenses. And/or not manifest if used in one-off-single-shot point and shoot mode. The GFX has some kind of focus stability problem across multiple shots; it might not apply to single-shot usage.

“I’ll shoot myself avant que j'arrive a Calais if the focus is off une foi plus... merde!”
f4 @ 0.3 sec, ISO 100; 2017-03-09 18:02:58
GFX 50S + Fujifilm GF 120mm f/4 Macro R LM OIS WR @ 95mm equiv (120mm)

[low-res image for bot]
Can’t love focus results based on faith or hope, that’s as charitable as can be said
f4 @ 1/25 sec, ISO 100; 2017-03-09 17:46:58
GFX 50S + Fujifilm GF 120mm f/4 Macro R LM OIS WR @ 95mm equiv (120mm)

[low-res image for bot]

CLICK TO VIEW: Fujifilm GFX System


Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo
View all handpicked deals...

Samsung RU8000 82" Class HDR 4K UHD Smart LED TV
$3198 $1798
SAVE $1400

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.