Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$700 $500
SAVE $200

$4499 $4499
SAVE $0

$60 $40
SAVE $20

$1699 $1199
SAVE $500

$950 $700
SAVE $250

$1597 $997
SAVE $600

$1499 $1259
SAVE $240

$400 $360
SAVE $40

$372 $247
SAVE $125

$9999 $2999
SAVE $7000

$4500 $3500
SAVE $1000

$1000 $500
SAVE $500

$1398 $898
SAVE $500

$829 $799
SAVE $30

$935 $935
SAVE $0

$309 $259
SAVE $49

$1118 $1118
SAVE $0

$450 $280
SAVE $170

$1499 $1249
SAVE $250

$700 $600
SAVE $100

$2000 $1270
SAVE $730

$1499 $779
SAVE $720

$450 $120
SAVE $330

$250 $230
SAVE $20

$3998 $3498
SAVE $500

$150 $80
SAVE $70

$369 $175
SAVE $194

$1699 $1199
SAVE $500

$649 $449
SAVE $200

$1498 $998
SAVE $500

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$1099 $999
SAVE $100

$400 $320
SAVE $80

$2399 $2199
SAVE $200

$7697 $4997
SAVE $2700

Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB
OWC Envoy Pro EX SSD
Blazingly fast Thunderbolt 3 SSD!

Up to 4TB capacity, USB-C compatible.

USB-C model also available


Great for travel or for desktop!

Nikon D850: Evaluating Noise Properly

See my Nikon wish list and get Nikon D850 at B&H Photo.

Nikon D850

Nikon is claiming image quality that is a full stop better at every ISO, e.g. ISO 12800 is as good as ISO 6400 on the D810. And without losing quality at the base ISO.

John W writes:

I have now looked at some of the full-res sample Nikon D850 images online, and they look very good - except that they have not allayed my concerns about dynamic range. In fact, a few of them have increased my concern. But, I think what I was seeing were straight out-of-camera JPEG, so I guess we really don't know much about the dynamic range until we get a RAW editor.

DIGLLOYD: Evaluations of noise must verify proper exposure, which is why I advise getting and using RawDigger as well as understanding ETTR exposure (Expose To The Right). That’s why most “lab” or “quick” tests are of little value—they do not verify that the sensor dynamic range is actually used, which is insanity unless one wants to evaluate noise based on auto-exposure (which changes with metering mode and subject matter)—untenable as a defensible approach. In short, I find that few noise evaluations have any merit, at least not for any serious about exposing properly.

JPEGs are meaningless for noise comparisons unless one is specifically evaluating JPEG performance. The camera configuration has so many variables that influence how noise the JPEG is, so unless all settings are spelled out, JPEG noise tells us little. Moreover, one camera could use settings that make it look better than another in JPEG. RAW is the only proper way to evaluate noise.

Just because two cameras are ISO 100 does not mean they meter and behave the same at ISO 100. So fixed lighting and ISO is not a defensible metric either. Most recently, see Increase Image Quality by Optimal Exposure (ETTR, Dolls) in my review of the Hasselblad X1D which has commentary on the very different exposure behavior of the Nikon D810 vs the Hasselblad X1D.

Many cameras auto-expose in a manner that gives up a whopping 1.5 to 2.5 stops of dynamic range and that is why I generally include the RawDigger histogram when evaluating noise—see Real World Dynamic Range in my review of the Nikon D810 as just one example as well as Shootout vs Nikon D810: 4-stop Underexposure + Push (Flowers) when comparing the Nikon D810 to the Hasselblad X1D.

Nikon D850: Backside illuminate CMOS sensor vs Conventional CMOS sensor
OWC Mercury Elite Pro Dock

Up to 32TB Capacity!


Dual-drive solution from 4TB to 32TB, hardware RAID, USB ports, DisplayPort, gigabit ethernet, SD card reader.

Huge capacity in travel-friendly form-factor.

MacPerformanceGuide.com
View all handpicked deals...

Apple 15.4" MacBook Pro with Touch Bar (Mid 2018, Space Gray)
$4499 $4499
SAVE $0

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.