Conclusions and Recommendations for Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art
2019-09-27 • SEND FEEDBACK | 
Related: Sigma, Sigma FE, Sigma FE 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art, Sigma Lenses, Sony, Sony A7R, Sony A7R II, Sony A7R III, Sony A7R IV, Sony mirrorless
Related: Sigma, Sigma FE, Sigma FE 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art, Sigma Lenses, Sony, Sony A7R, Sony A7R II, Sony A7R III, Sony A7R IV, Sony mirrorless
I’m taking the fairly unusual step of laying out my extensive thoughts on the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art now, because I expect to drop usage of most of the other lenses in its zoom range for shooting during the rest of my trip—why shoot next-best? But the Sigma 14-24/2.8 is not without its issues nonetheless.
Conclusions and Recommendations on the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art
As said in a previous post: I’m not sure I could have done better with the Fujifilm GFX100, and probably less good. It’s all about the optics including sharpness, real (actual) depth of field, color correction, etc.
Fall Colors near Alpine Pond
[low-res image for bot]
f6.3 @ 2.5 sec electronic shutter focus stack 3 frames, ISO 100; 2019-09-26 19:05:35
Sony A7R IV + Sigma FE 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art @ 18mm equiv (18.6mm)
ENV: Twenty Lakes Basin, altitude 10300 ft / 3139 m, 53°F / 11°C
RAW: LACA corrected, +100 Shadows, -86 Highlights, +57 Whites, USM {5,50,0}
Sony A7R IV + Sigma FE 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art @ 18mm equiv (18.6mm)
ENV: Twenty Lakes Basin, altitude 10300 ft / 3139 m, 53°F / 11°C
RAW: LACA corrected, +100 Shadows, -86 Highlights, +57 Whites, USM {5,50,0}
[low-res image for bot]
