Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$310 $250
SAVE $60

$64 $48
SAVE $16

$250 $140
SAVE $110

$1197 $897
SAVE $300

$3498 $3498
SAVE $click

$1837 $1599
SAVE $238

$1349 $1349
SAVE $click

$250 $140
SAVE $110

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$1079 $999
SAVE $80

$400 $240
SAVE $160

$2797 $2497
SAVE $300

$1997 $1597
SAVE $400

$1197 $897
SAVE $300

$3000 $1800
SAVE $1200

$799 $799
SAVE $click

$969 $619
SAVE $350

$2199 $1599
SAVE $600

$1798 $1098
SAVE $700

$1397 $1297
SAVE $100

Upgrade the memory of your 2018 Mac mini up to 64GB

Adobe Camera Raw Enhance Details Produces Striping Pattern Noise on Nikon D850, Other Cameras

Readers know that I’ve been a big fan of Adobe Camera Raw Enhance Details for its sharpness and micro contrast improvements, and reduction in moiré.

However, I have now seen striping pattern noise and crosshatching pattern noise with cameras of different brands and sensor technologies, including the Sony A7R III, Sony A7R IV, Fujifilm GFX100, and now the Nikon D850. I submitted a bug report to Adobe back in July, but I have not heard of any progress on the matter as yet.

With much regret, I must question the general viability of Enhance Details. While striping pattern noise and crosshatching pattern noise are frequently masked by sensor noise along with subject matter detail, using Enhance Details might be unacceptable with many images, particularly for large prints. Plus, using frame averaging makes any pattern noise pop out like a sore thumb, since once noise is reduced, any latent pattern is revealed.

Potential cause: sensitivity difference between rows of sensor?

My hypothesis is that the striping problem is not created by Enhance Details but already latent in the original raw files, with Enhance Details making that latent pattern visible. If so, the issue should affect all cameras, excepting those that have very fine tuned image processing that entirely neutralizes differences across rows of the sensor (some high-end cameras might do so).

In particular, my hypothesis is that the striping pattern noise or crosshatching pattern noise that emerges is the result of a small sensitivity differential between the rows of Bayer matrix cameras.

The RawDigger folks tell me that Monochrome2DNG compensates for inter-row sensitivity differences when processing raw files into monochrome DNG files. Seemingly, Adobe Camera Raw Enhance Details is not taking this differential into account (or cannot or is not doing it well, for reasons unknown to me). Which makes it a bug in any practical sense.

The pattern is seen whether processing the Enhanced DNG file with ACR into color or black and white, so it is inherent to the DNG produced by Enhance Details. Which also points out that processing into DNG with Enhance Details and then discarding the original raw files is a Very Very Bad Idea, since there is at least some hope for a fix.

$D-$N-CanyonWall_striping_crop2

With the Nikon D850, the predominant pattern is horizontal striping pattern noise (shot in landscape orientation), which tends to confirm the inter-row differential theory. There is also a certain crosshatching pattern composed of a checkerboard style arrangement of darker black dots. My guess is that these dots are another manifestation of sensitivity differential: the red or green or blue pixels in one row are slightly different in sensitivity to those in nearby rows.

Below, enlarged crops from a Nikon D850 raw file (14-bit lossless compressed). Toggle to compare the three.
ACR = Adobe Camera Raw processing of the original raw file, ACR_Enhanced = ACR processing of the DNG from Enhance Details.

Enlarged crop from Nikon D850 image
(metadata does not change when toggling)
f7.1 @ 1/8 sec, ISO 31; 2019-10-21 14:18:25
NIKON D850 + Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4
RAW: Enhance Details, push 0 stops, +0 Shadows, -30 Highlights, +40 Whites

[low-res image for bot]

The pattern of checkerboard spots is readily visible here in the trees against the sky, with the spots along with the striping pattern noise seen in the rocks.

Enlarged crop from Nikon D850 image
(metadata does not change when toggling)
f7.1 @ 1/8 sec, ISO 31; 2019-10-21 14:18:25
NIKON D850 + Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4
RAW: Enhance Details, push 0 stops, +0 Shadows, -30 Highlights, +40 Whites

[low-res image for bot]

The sky is affected, and looks particularly bad in black and white when darker.

Enlarged crop from Nikon D850 image
(metadata does not change when toggling)
f7.1 @ 1/8 sec, ISO 31; 2019-10-21 14:18:25
NIKON D850 + Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4
RAW: Enhance Details, push 0 stops, +0 Shadows, -30 Highlights, +40 Whites

[low-res image for bot]

Best Deals, Updated Weekly
View all handpicked deals...

Nanuk 905 Hard Utility Case with Foam Insert (Black)
$64 $48
SAVE $16

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.