Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Upgrade the memory of your 2020 iMac up to 128GB
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$399 $199
SAVE $200

$2797 $2497
SAVE $300

$1398 $998
SAVE $400

$1499 $999
SAVE $500

$549 $499
SAVE $50

$799 $549
SAVE $250

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

$3899 $1499
SAVE $2400

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1398 $998
SAVE $400

$1798 $1198
SAVE $600

$240 $175
SAVE $65

$240 $175
SAVE $65

$1399 $799
SAVE $600

$1798 $1198
SAVE $600

$1997 $1797
SAVE $200

$3399 $2699
SAVE $700

$400 $300
SAVE $100

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

Do Leica M Lenses Really Render in Some Special Way?

Do Leica M lenses really render in a special way versus other brands? Are they sharper?

Fact is, they are not sharper. Rendering... that gets into preferences and rationalizations.

Roy P writes:

Leica 75mm f/1.25 Noctilux-M ASPH

I used to have the Leica 75mm f/1.25 Noctilux-M-ASPH, which I had bought from a dealer at a discount for $10K, but when the price , but when the US prices went up to $14K, I didn’t have the heart to not take a decent profit, so I sold it :)

But my reason for selling it was, in my head to head comparison (pretty extensive, BTW), my Sony FE 85/1.4 GM at f/1.4 consistently gave me a center sharpness that was at least as good as the Nocti at even f/1.4, let alone f/1.25, and gave me an even more nuanced bokeh at f/1.4 compared to the Noctilux at f/1.25 for both constant magnification and constant camera-to-subject distance (with both lenses on my Sony A7R IV).

The 75mm Noctilux was also a PITA to use, needlessly heavy and clumsy to handle. Last but not least, for its primary intended use (portraiture), even with the goofy EVF, it doesn’t come close to eye AF on a Sony camera. In the time it takes to achieve eye focus with the Nocti, even assuming both the subject and I had stopped breathing and remained perfectly still, I would have 10-12 shots already taken with a Sony in the AF-C mode, giving me a big array of images to choose from. The 75 Noctilux is an ill-conceived product made to showcase Peter Karbe’s (undeniable) talent at the user’s expense.

I also have a Sony 135mm f/2.8 (t/4.5) STF lens (A-mount) and an adapter to the M mount. It’s a little clumsy, but works pretty well. The Sony images are far more pleasing than you’d get out of the Leica 135mm f/3.4 APO-Telyt-M.

DIGLLOYD: I concur on every point.

And sticking with M-compatible lenses, I’d take the Zeiss ZM 35mm f/1.4 over any Leica 35mm lens, the Zeiss being superior in sharpness and micro contrast, bokeh, focus shift, field curvature,and rendering style—for less than half the price.

OWC Thunderblade Thunderbolt 3 SSD

Blazing fast, up to 16TB.

YEE HAH!



√ No more slow and noisy hard drives!

Save the tax, we pay you back, instantly!

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2021 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.