Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
2023-03-29 09:25:08
Get all the tools you need to upgrade the factory HDD of any 2009-2019 iMac to a larger HDD or a modern SSD.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$479 $379
SAVE $100

$240 $160
SAVE $80

$499 $339
SAVE $160

$110 $60
SAVE $50

$1899 $1399
SAVE $500

$3499 $2899
SAVE $600

$520 $250
SAVE $270

$630 $360
SAVE $270

$800 $340
SAVE $460

$350 $300
SAVE $50

$450 $230
SAVE $220

$800 $340
SAVE $460

$1000 $400
SAVE $600

$3879 $3629
SAVE $250

$2774 $2209
SAVE $565

$599 $564
SAVE $35

$1550 $1425
SAVE $125

$1249 $1149
SAVE $100

$350 $320
SAVE $30

$1149 $949
SAVE $200

$1099 $999
SAVE $100

$1049 $879
SAVE $170

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1049 $899
SAVE $150

$2074 $1659
SAVE $415

$2148 $1648
SAVE $500

$200 $140
SAVE $60

$1629 $1179
SAVE $450

$450 $230
SAVE $220

$470 $330
SAVE $140

$5999 $2999
SAVE $3000

$339 $169
SAVE $170

$979 $879
SAVE $100

$2198 $1598
SAVE $600

$1299 $1199
SAVE $100

$2999 $1799
SAVE $1200

$998 $678
SAVE $320

$2394 $1694
SAVE $700

Adobe Releases Photoshop CC 23.4.1 — FIXES Serious Performance Bugs on Apple Mac Studio M1 Ultra

Consult with Lloyd on your computer or photographic purchase, backup strategy, archival and storage strategy, etc.

A big thank-you to B&H Photo for sending the $7999 Apple Mac Studio M1 Ultra 20-core CPU / 64-core GPU/ 128GB / 8TB SSD for review. This is exactly the configuration I would buy excepting a preference for a 4TB SSD (only to keep the cost down).

With today’s release of Photoshop CC 2022 v23.4.1, the performance problems have vaporized, and the M1 Ultra is at least not meaningfully slower than the M1 Max. And a little faster in some cases, meaning about 25% faster than v23.3.2

UPDATE: I’m seeing signs that thermal throttling may be at play in the M1 Ultra, eg a test that over iterations gets slower and slower. I might have to wait until morning to test (it is 90°F in my office). Also, not all tests are faster, but as yet I am unsure if this is temperature related.
diglloydHuge, 20 iterations: average = 20.96 {17.24, 16.53, 16.47, 16.39, 16.28, 16.27, 22.86, 22.84, 22.85, 22.83, 22.84, 22.84, 22.84, 22.85, 22.88, 23.03, 22.85, 22.86, 22.85, 22.87}
UPDATE: does NOT look like thermal throttling. I suspect a memory leak problem now; after running one benchmark (panorama), Photoshop was at 100GB memory usage after 20 iterations, which is absurd. OTOH, the Mac Pro hit 230GB after only 14 iterations. Not sure what Adobe has wrought with this release, but that is beyond absurd.

It does make one wonder if Adobe QC is asleep at the switch, not able to detect something as basic as a 20-core being 25% slower than a 10-core machine. Before shipping the dreck to customers. Dang. But at least things look a lot better now.

Call it good timing or bad?

Terrible timing because I have hours of work ahead to re-test and republish everything related to Photoshop, and on two machines.

GREAT timing because it means I can redo the tests to show what the Apple Mac Studio M1 Ultra can do. Had I sent the Mac Studio back, I’d be left with test results that would have been out of date overnight.

CLICK TO VIEW: Apple Mac Studio at B&H Photo

CLICK TO VIEW: Thunderbolt and Related Accessories


Save the tax, we pay you back, instantly!
View all handpicked deals...

CyberPower BRG1500AVRLCD Intelligent LCD Series Uninterruptible Power Supply
$240 $160
SAVE $80

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.