EXCERPT page containing first few paragraphs. 2019-12-11 22:11:32
UA_SEARCH_BOT_null @ 188.8.131.52
A good way to understand the results possible with infrared is to study the same image taken in color and infrared.
Note that many renditions are possible; different “looks” can be achieved by post-processing an image. An authentic infrared image displays quite different tonal (brightness) relationships than even a heavily manipulated color image.
The tonal separation and false color possibilities are better with some cameras than others. For example, the Canon 5D-IR and Nikon D70-IR both provide better tonal separation than the Fuji F30-IR. Whether this is due to the usual higher quality seen with digital SLRs, or a function of the sensor itself can’t be easily determined, and isn’t important to the end game. But the difference is real.
Article continues for subscribers...
Diglloyd Infrared Photography is by yearly subscription. Subscribe now for about 8 cents a day ($30/year).
BEST DEAL: get full access to ALL 8 PUBLICATIONS for only 68 cents a day ($249.95)!
Diglloyd Infrared Photography covers cameras and lenses for infrared photography.
The coverage explains all the issues involved in shooting in infrared, which do not change. It is not a review of any particular camera or lens, though many examples are included.
- Guidance on workflow for infrared, including black and white and channel swapping for false-color images.
- How infrared renders, and why certain spectral cutoffs matter: false color vs black and white.
- Image quality issues to be on the lookout for in infrared.
- Numerous lens evaluations in infrared.
Left to right: Nikon D200, Nikon D70-IR, Nikon D70-IR with B+W 093 filter