Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$80 $25
SAVE $55

$3198 $1798
SAVE $1400

$2799 $2099
SAVE $700

$199 $129
SAVE $70

$140 $100
SAVE $40

$699 $549
SAVE $150

$4499 $2649
SAVE $1850

$1699 $1199
SAVE $500

$5999 $5499
SAVE $500

$181 $141
SAVE $40

$7699 $7199
SAVE $500

$4499 $2649
SAVE $1850

$400 $330
SAVE $70

$4499 $2649
SAVE $1850

$4999 $4599
SAVE $400

$2350 $1950
SAVE $400

$1700 $1300
SAVE $400

$799 $699
SAVE $100

$200 $160
SAVE $40

$1997 $897
SAVE $1100

$250 $110
SAVE $140

$1398 $898
SAVE $500

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$3999 $2499
SAVE $1500

$200 $170
SAVE $30

$3999 $2499
SAVE $1500

$1498 $1398
SAVE $100

$2497 $1897
SAVE $600

$748 $598
SAVE $150

$899 $699
SAVE $200

Memory Upgrades for 2019 Mac Pro - Save Up to 65% vs Factory Costs

Photozoom Pro 3 — poster child for CPU core utilization

With version 2, Photozoom Pro ran more or less single threaded (see CPU Cores Explained). With the recently released version 3, Photozoom Pro 3 is the poster child for the ideal scenario: all available CPU cores being used to their maximum. It is a great example of where a dual-CPU machine kicks butt over a single-CPU machine.

The green area represents CPU usage, and black is idle (the black area at left is prior to the start of the scaling operation). See Monitoring System Performance for more on understanding performance. Here we see 1536% CPU usage out of a maximum of 1600% (for 16 virtual CPU cores). It doesn’t get much better than that.

Photozoom Pro 3 CPU usage

But using CPU cores is more than just using them. They need to scale: twice as many cores should ideally be twice as fast. What’s amazing about Photozoom Pro 3 is that it scales perfectly, an amazing feat compared to what is more typical or even unexpected. We could realistically expect a dual CPU Mac Pro to be about 75% faster than a single CPU system for a well-written program (most programs have some kind of internal bottleneck like memory contention).

I tested scalability by sizing up a Nikon D3x image to 200% of original size, generating a 558.4MB 16-bit TIF. I ran the test with all 16 virtual cores enabled (both CPUs) and with one of the CPUs disabled (using Apple’s CHUD tools), leaving 8 virtual cores active. Here are the times for S-Spline Max:

Dual CPU:    6:17
Single CPU: 12:35

Scalability doesn’t get any more ideal than that. I could’t even credibly make it up.

I tested version 2 against version 3 and saw these results using S-Spline XL (much faster but slightly lower quality than S-Spline Max):

PZP version 2: 80 sec
PZP version 3: 21 sec

For whatever reason, S-Spline XL uses only about half the CPU cores. Still, there is a 4X speedup from version 2 to version 3. What a great upgrade!


Best Deals, Updated Weekly
View all handpicked deals...

Samsung RU8000 82" Class HDR 4K UHD Smart LED TV
$3198 $1798
SAVE $1400

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.