Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB
Handpicked deals...
$3099 $1999
SAVE $1100

$3199 $2099
SAVE $1100

$4199 $2899
SAVE $1300

$2299 $1499
SAVE $800

$3399 $2399
SAVE $1000

$3198 $2198
SAVE $1000

$795 $695
SAVE $100

$5499 $4999
SAVE $500

$1799 $1299
SAVE $500

$719 $299
SAVE $420

$1799 $1299
SAVE $500

$795 $344
SAVE $451

$1997 $897
SAVE $1100

$1100 $900
SAVE $200

$348 $278
SAVE $70

$3099 $1999
SAVE $1100

$2099 $1799
SAVE $300

$699 $499
SAVE $200

$1699 $1299
SAVE $400

$2999 $2599
SAVE $400

$1699 $1443
SAVE $256

$2798 $2498
SAVE $300

$2399 $2199
SAVE $200

$3798 $1898
SAVE $1900

$2840 $2498
SAVE $342

$2497 $1897
SAVE $600

$2498 $1798
SAVE $700

$3297 $1997
SAVE $1300

$2798 $2498
SAVE $300

$2998 $2498
SAVE $500

$1398 $1198
SAVE $200

$898 $798
SAVE $100

$1299 $939
SAVE $360

$4499 $2799
SAVE $1700

$4999 $4599
SAVE $400

$2199 $1999
SAVE $200

$2799 $2349
SAVE $450

$3099 $1999
SAVE $1100

$2016 $1298
SAVE $718

$249 $149
SAVE $100

$2844 $2297
SAVE $547

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$2019 $1399
SAVE $620

$999 $949
SAVE $50

Extended returns thru Feb 1, 2020.

Leica 90mm f/2.2 Thambar-M Aperture Series: Sunset for a Dead Pine (M240)

Get Leica 90mm f/2.2 Thamber-M at B&H Photo.

This series assesses the Leica 90mm f/2.2 Thamber-M through f/9 on a far distance scene. results at distance show just how strikingly good today’s $300 lenses are compared to 80-year-old lens designs, although perhaps there were better 90mm lens designs back then, and ones trying to avoid soft focus.

Leica 90mm f/2.2 Thambar-M Aperture Series: Sunset for a Dead Pine

Includes the aperture series f/ 2.2, 2.4, 2.6, 3.2, 4.5, 6.3, 9 at sizes up to full camera resolution.

Sunset for a Dead Pine
f2.2 @ 1/3000 sec, ISO 200; 2018-06-14 19:37:52
LEICA M (Typ 240) + Leica 90mm f/2.2 Thambar-M

[low-res image for bot]

David C writes:

Could it be that you accidentally substituted a jpeg from an old cellphone for the thambar-m image you intended? at least on my screen “soft” doesn’t really go far enough.

DIGLLOYD: a cell phone would be tharper.

Dan M writes in response to my comment “While it is surely a specialty optic, it’s hard to conceive of paying $6500 for a lens designed for inferior performance when world-class performance in a Zeiss Otus costs at most about $4500.”

For those images you posted just now? That’s taking $6,500 out on the front lawn and burning it. Well, maybe pooping on it first, then burning it.

DIGLLOYD: not for Leica collectors—they’re loving it (isn’t that the phrase McDonald’ uses? Which seems appropriate compared to regular Leica glass).

Peter K writes:

This comparison is not completely fair, because in 1930 Leica introduced this LEICA Thambar 90mm/2.2 only as a soft-focus lens and not as a 'normal' lens.

I have to admit that until today I haven’t seen a single picture made with the LEICA Thambar 90mm/2.2 that makes me smile]. In 1931 Leica had a 'normal' LEICA Elmar 90mm/4.0 in their program. You can assume this lens gives different results compared with the LEICA Thambar 90mm/2.2.

DIGLLOYD: also, Leica has single-coated the lens elements on the modern Thamber. Also, an f/4 lens is necessarily better, and indeed the Thambar 90/2.2 improves a lot by f/4, though it is still a very weak performer.

Jason W writes:

I agree with your evaluation of the subject qualities of the Thambar, but couldn't one produce a highly similar diffusion effect with a $20 pro mist filter?

DIGLLOYD: probably the mist filter would be sharper, and different as well, which does not mean less pleasing. I was thinking of vaseline on a filter also.


Save the tax, we pay you back, instantly!
View all handpicked deals...

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV DSLR Camera with Canon Log and Accessory Kit
$3199 $2099
SAVE $1100

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2019 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.