Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$45 $22
SAVE $23

$5699 $3999
SAVE $1700

$1799 $1349
SAVE $450

$2999 $2399
SAVE $600

$131 $131
SAVE $0

$539 $539
SAVE $0

$18599 $17599
SAVE $1000

$600 $400
SAVE $200

$274 $174
SAVE $100

$1149 $799
SAVE $350

$1499 $999
SAVE $500

$150 $150
SAVE $0

$1799 $1349
SAVE $450

$1399 $1049
SAVE $350

$150 $50
SAVE $100

$380 $340
SAVE $40

$489 $389
SAVE $100

$274 $174
SAVE $100

$400 $330
SAVE $70

$420 $170
SAVE $250

$699 $699
SAVE $0

$1597 $1097
SAVE $500

$499 $499
SAVE $0

$4500 $4500
SAVE $0

$1000 $1000
SAVE $0

$370 $330
SAVE $40

$700 $700
SAVE $0

$1499 $699
SAVE $800

$700 $700
SAVE $0

$1499 $699
SAVE $800

$420 $170
SAVE $250

$369 $200
SAVE $169

$1699 $1399
SAVE $300

$649 $649
SAVE $0

$1498 $998
SAVE $500

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$1099 $999
SAVE $100

$400 $330
SAVE $70

Upgrade the memory of your 2018 Mac mini up to 64GB
Canon EOS R5

NEW! Available for pre-order.

45 megapixels, 8K30 and 4K120 10-bit video, IBIS, 5.7 megadot EVF, 20 fps.

Hasselblad XCD 21mm f/4 Firmware Bug: Shows 35mm Equivalent as 94mm (looks like general bug affecting all lenses?)

See my Hasselblad medium format wish list.

Someone at Hasselblad apparently copied the EXIF firmware info from the Hasselblad XCD 120mm f/3.5 with a 94mm equivalent focal length to the Hasselblad XCD 21mm f/4.

This is annoying because I’ve published a bunch of images now all of which have bogus information in them. It’s too time consuming and space wasting to fix it.

As per RawDigger for raw files for the Hasselblad XCD 21mm f/4:

Focal Length : 21.0 mm
Focal Length In 35mm Format : 94 mm
Focal Length : 21.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 94.0 mm)
Hyperfocal Distance : 16.42 m

The strange thing is that some raw files are affected, but not all! (I did not change the firmware). My guess is that somehow after switching lenses the camera does not update its internal EXIF info—maybe the camera has to be powered off, then back on? This theory is supported in seeing that the image affected are all 'bad' immediately after switching from the 120/3.5 to the 21/4.

The image below has the correction information in EXIF. The one after it does not, and that one followed a 120/3.5 image.

Lloyd and Daughter
f6.3 @ 1/6 sec, ISO 100; 2018-08-17 18:24:29
Hasselblad X1D + Hasselblad XCD 21mm f/4 @ 17.9mm equiv (21mm) ENV: Rock Creek, altitude 9950 ft / 3033 m

[low-res image for bot]

The image below has the bad info in it ("94mm"), so I put in a real-time fix in my server-side code to correct the data already in images I had published from "94mm" to "18mm". I also fixed the focal length equivalence to match according to the long edge and I also took into account the true focal length. IMO it is cheating to call a 21.8mm lens a 21mm but I have not corrected that since it is the specified nominal focal length.

36/44 * 21.8mm = 17.8mm equivalent

Ellery Lake
f5.6 @ 1/350 sec, ISO 100; 2018-08-22 11:28:20
Hasselblad X1D + Hasselblad XCD 21mm f/4 @ 17.9mm equiv (21mm)
ENV: Ellery Lake, altitude 9700 ft / 2957 m
focus on rock outcrop near center

[low-res image for bot]
Save Big $$$$ on Memory for 2019 Mac Pro

Up to 65% better pricing than Apple

Lloyd recommends 32GB RDIMM modules for most users (more expensive LRDIMMS are for 512GB or more).


Sony 12-24mm f/2.8 GM

NEW! Available for pre-order.

3 XA Elements, 2 Super ED elements, nano AR II and fluorine coatings, four focusing motors, dust and moisture sealed.

Our trusted photo rental store
View all handpicked deals...

SmallHD Reference Grade 17" Production Monitor with Teradek Sidekick II Receiver
$5699 $3999
SAVE $1700

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.