Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
2024-04-26 17:57:01
Designed for the most demanding needs of photographers and videographers.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1999 $998
SAVE $1001

$500 $400
SAVE $100

$2499 $1999
SAVE $500

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$2499 $2099
SAVE $400

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1049 $849
SAVE $200

$680 $680
SAVE $click

$300 $300
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$4499 $3499
SAVE $1000

$999 $999
SAVE $click

$799 $699
SAVE $100

$1199 $899
SAVE $300

AI Imagery: Starting Now, All Still Or Video Imagery Must Be Assumed Fake By Default

re: artificial intelligence
re: Michael Erlewine

re: Will AI Doom Photography, News, Truth?
re: AI and Photography, Weaponization of AI

Starting this year, all still or video imagery must be assumed fake by default. This has long been the case in the “news” (for many reasons), but it must now be the default for all imagery everywhere.

Credibility can be based on certification of some kind, such as cryptographic signing, along with the past history and crediblity of the certifier. It’s a huge can of worms, nonetheless.

Digital notarization for imagery

Perhaps we need a new requirement for cameras: cryptographically-signed imagery so that you and I can prove cryptographically “I made this image”. And more importantly, so that others cannot claim you or I made an image (eg one that might get you into trouble, or defame you).

And since I shoot RAW format, a similar cryptographic signature would be needed for the images I publish, including author’s comments or testimony as to their manipulation or lack thereof.

Of course, such systems are only as good as the security of the cryptographic key, yet another security challenge.

The legal system

Consider AI imagery that falsely portrays a person in a compromising situation. Presumably this would a form of libel, but that does not stop a reputation from overnight destruction. New laws with harsh penalties are likely needed for such things.

Expect convictions in the court system based on falsefied imagery. IMO, courts should not accept imagery as evidence unless it can be proven (using AI or other methods) that it is original and unaltered and not AI generated.

Reader Comments

Michael E writes:

I always sign my Midjourney graphics with this: [Midjourney graphic prompted by me.]

DIGLLOYD: that’s great in informing a viewer. But it is a claim that cannot be certified, eg someone could generate child porn, and instruct the AI to sign it as someone else. It has to be a cryptographic assertion that only the real person could generate.


View all handpicked deals...

Seagate 22TB IronWolf Pro 7200 rpm SATA III 3.5" Internal NAS HDD (CMR)
$500 $400
SAVE $100

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | X.com/diglloyd
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.