EXCERPT page containing first few paragraphs. 2017-03-30 15:41:34
UA_SEARCH_BOT_null @ 22.214.171.124
Unsolicited comments from readers, with my unvarnished point-blank thoughts.
Much of what is written here should be understood as personal reactions and subjective evaluation (readers and mine), to the extent not backed up by facts (e.g., focus shift of the 120/4 is proven fact, opinions on fit and finish are subjective).
Howard C writes:
If it's optical, that's more troubling, unless the 120/4 is a defective copy. It would be amazing if you received both a defective body AND a defective lens.
I only have the zoom, and haven't had a chance to go out and shoot with it yet. What was your assessment of the 63 so far? Notably better than the 120?
Article continues for subscribers...
Already a subscriber? CLICK HERE TO LOG IN
Diglloyd Medium Format is by yearly subscription. Subscribe now for about 27 cents a day ($100/year).
BEST DEAL: get full access to ALL 7 PUBLICATIONS for only 68 cents a day ($249.95)!
These systems are hugely expensive, so make the right choice for your own needs (full frame vs medium format).
- In-depth lens evaluations covering behaviors not likely to be found anywhere else, based on real-world field shooting.
- How to configure menus and buttons and best operating practices, gotchas and how-to.
- Real world examples with insights found nowhere else. Make sharper images just by understanding lens and camera behaviors.
- Jaw-dropping image quality found nowhere else utilizing Retina-grade images up to 50 megapixels filling up to 5K display, plus large crops.
- Aperture series from wide open through stopped down, showing the full range of lens performance and bokeh.
- Optical quality analysis of field curvature, focus shift, sharpness, flare, distortion, and performance in the field.