Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$348 $248
SAVE $100

$898 $798
SAVE $100

$899 $799
SAVE $100

$899 $769
SAVE $130

$597 $497
SAVE $100

$2597 $2397
SAVE $200

$1798 $1298
SAVE $500

$148 $138
SAVE $10

$4096 $3079
SAVE $1018

$1597 $1297
SAVE $300

$80 $30
SAVE $50

$196 $146
SAVE $50

$240 $175
SAVE $65

$663 $463
SAVE $200

$400 $270
SAVE $130

$1645 $1345
SAVE $300

$2106 $1476
SAVE $630

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$400 $270
SAVE $130

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

Memory Upgrades for 2019 Mac Pro - Save Up to 65% vs Factory Costs

Fujifilm X-E1 Artifacting: Counterpoint

This issue is present via ACR, SilkyPix and JPEG. SilkyPix and JPEG produce such impaire sharpness that that the evidence is less obvious, but it is still there.

See discussion of the Fujifilm X-E1 artifacting issue, which is identical to the Fujifilm X-Pro1 as well as the Fujifilm X-E1 artifacting example and the reader comments.

Just published in my Guide to Mirrorless is a Fujifilm X-E1 artifacting counterpoint example.

This example is of the same scene with same lens, same RAW processing and sharpening, but varies in reproduction ratio slightly, and in color temperature of the lighting. The artifacting is still present, but in some areas (doll’s hair), the difference is night and day. As of this writing, the reason(s) for this difference are entirely unclear, but what I found in field shooting the X-Pro1 was that some images look good, and others look truly awful.

Test scene

Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo
View all handpicked deals...

Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G Lens
$898 $798
SAVE $100

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.