Handpicked deals...
$41 $18
SAVE $23

$200 $170
SAVE $30

$160 $140
SAVE $20

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

$3499 $2199
SAVE $1300

$2399 $2159
SAVE $240

$1499 $1148
SAVE $351

$590 $472
SAVE $118

$1299 $997
SAVE $302

$1199 $1015
SAVE $184

$3999 $2499
SAVE $1500

$1498 $1098
SAVE $400

$2897 $1797
SAVE $1100

$3297 $1897
SAVE $1400

$870 $749
SAVE $121

$3499 $2199
SAVE $1300

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

$748 $598
SAVE $150

$899 $699
SAVE $200

$799 $729
SAVE $70

$3499 $2199
SAVE $1300

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

$1997 $897
SAVE $1100

$3099 $2499
SAVE $600

$2799 $2199
SAVE $600

$4999 $4599
SAVE $400

$4499 $2650
SAVE $1849

Zeiss 15/2.8 Distagon Q&A — Optical Performance

ZF.2 15mm f/2.8 Distagon T*

This is one of several pages resulting from the March 13, 2012 discussion with Staff Scientist Dr. Hubert Nasse. See the original list of questions.

These pages are a summary of the discussion based on notes taken, and as reviewed by Dr. Nasse. Bracketed comments [ ] are editorial in nature.

Flare control is really outstanding, and distortion is a low 2% barrel distortion.

MTF and field curvature

There is a rapid onset of field curvature right around the edges, but MTF for 10 lp/mm remains very good in the corners, just not for fine detail. There can be some individual sample variation as to the corners.

Field curvature changes slightly with aperture, especially with wide angle lenses. With the 15/2.8 Distagon, field curvature explains why the MTF for the corners at f/5.6 for fine structures is less good than wide open at f/2.8. Stopping down to f/8 improves the corner sharpness via depth of field. [Field shots confirm this, also the subject matter distance relative to the focus distance might mean some corner blur, or very little].

Dr. Nasse explains:

That the corners are not at their peak performance wide open is very normal for all wide and fast lenses, macro lenses and tele lenses are the main exception.

Many fast wide-angle lenses and many wide zooms have a correction style where MTF is high and field quite flat up to about 15-17mm image height, and then the image surface suddenly curves backwards rapidly. This is visible in the standard MTF presentations in the sudden drop of all lines above this critical image height.

All this is quite mild in the Distagon T* 2,8/15.

OWC Holiday Stocking Stuffers

Order today by 5 PM Central, get by XMAS!

Macs, iPhone, sound, accessoris, Beats, Homepod, much more!


Focus shift

There is very little focus shift with the 15/2.8 Distagon. My field tests show that it can be ignored as an issue for practical photography. Dr. Nasse states:

This statement can definitely be confirmed.

MTF graphs

See Making Sharp Images for how to interpret MTF charts.

Dr. Nasse states:

Measured MTF data in white light at taking distance “Infinity”. This is a typical sample for most of the pre-series samples I have seen. This first f-stop from 2.8 to 4 is practically invisible, so stopping down will just increase safety with respect to focus error and will slightly increase the depth of field (just close to the centre – see page 2). The bump at 10mm image height is slightly deeper than in the computation. Since it is caused by deformation of the image surface this is a normal deviation between ideal theory and built lenses.

At f/5.6 corners should be quite acceptable, at least the contrast is very high; best detail is rendered from f/8.

At f/11 the curves look like from many macro lenses, except from the tangential loss towards the edges which is caused by the residual lateral chromatic aberration. It is small but not zero in such a very wide one. Tangential MTF is further improved when one measures with a more narrow spectrum – green light with about 80nm bandwidth.

 

See comments above; this is a graph at f/11 using ~80nm bandwidth of green light.

ZEISS 15mm f/2.8 Distagon MTF @ f/11 (green light)

Close-up performance

In the old days, focusing 2 meters or close degraded sharpness quite badly in highly asymmetric retrofocus lens types. Then there were certain manual close-focus designs, with a separate “close focus” adjustment, but watch out if forgetting to adjust back to infinity!

With longer backfocal distance (retrofocus) designs, there is more of a need to compensate for close focus sharpness. The 15/2.8 Distagon has nicely solved the quality / distance quality issue with minimal sacrifice to image quality:

  • 15/2.8 Distagon has slight decrease in MTF at ~0.3 meters @ 1:25.
  • 15/2.8 Distagon degrades more in tangential resolution at close range 1:9.
  • At all other distances the image quality remains very high.
New Mac Pro?

Or iMac 5K or iMac Pro?
Consult with Lloyd ASAP before buying!


System configuration for CPU, GPU, memory, SSD, backup, RAID, optimizing performance, workflow.
For YOUR optimal workflow

Avoid costly mistakes in throwing money at the problem for less performance and/or buying the wrong machine for your own needs!

Remote screen sharing available for RAID, software configuration, etc.

More about 2019 Mac Pro vs iMac 5K vs iMac Pro...

Depth of field

High resolution digital cameras now have photosite sizes smaller than 5 microns. For peak sharpness from high performance lenses like the Zeiss 15mm f/2.8 Distagon, a more discerning standard might be considered using 5-micron circle of confusion.

Depth of field table for 30-micron and 5-micron photosites/pixels

 


Our trusted photo rental store

View all handpicked deals...

Apple AirPods with Wireless Charging Case (2nd Generation)
$200 $170
SAVE $30

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2019 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.