Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Get up to 16x more storage and 2x the speeds of the original drive
Handpicked deals...
$600 $600
SAVE $0

$1299 $999
SAVE $300

$3899 $3499
SAVE $400

$1498 $1098
SAVE $400

$2299 $1599
SAVE $700

$1598 $998
SAVE $600

$5500 $5000
SAVE $500

$2600 $2100
SAVE $500

$2798 $2498
SAVE $300

$1299 $950
SAVE $349

$1999 $1399
SAVE $600

$1299 $1124
SAVE $175

$2299 $1799
SAVE $500

$1299 $999
SAVE $300

$3397 $2697
SAVE $700

$3297 $2797
SAVE $500

$1999 $1199
SAVE $800

$3399 $2199
SAVE $1200

$400 $300
SAVE $100

Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8: the Negative Sharpness and Micro Contrast Effects of Correcting nearly 3% Pincushion Distortion

As context for my comments on the Panasonic LUMIX S 24-105mm f/4 coming soon, I was looking around for a good example of how distortion correction inevitably degrades micro contrast in areas that must be stretched, correction being particularly noxious for lenses with significant pincushion distortion because the central 2/3 of the frame gets stretched-out the most.

Distortion correction is relevant for anyone contemplating use of pixel shift or HighRes mode—the benefits are undermined by pixel-stretching.

With its 3% pincushion distortion, the Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 is a prominent example of a decision to cheat on optical correction and instead rely on distortion correction*. Never a plus, distortion correction is demonstrably damaging to micro contrast, and especially in regards to future higher resolution cameras. Allowing it is a design decision that I see as relegating a lens to guaranteed 2nd-tier status by needing to correct its distortion. A particularly startling example is the extreme barrel distortion of the Leica Q, which guarantees weak outer zones (and makes a 47MP LeicaQ2 a bit of a joke in terms of sharpness potential).

In diglloyd Mirrorless (included in subscription to diglloyd Mirrorless):

Zeiss Batis 85/1.8 Sonnar: Distortion and Distortion Correction

Includes corrected and uncorrected images up to full camera resolution, with crops.

* As a related concern, I object to publishing MTF charts for raw optical performance when the lens flags itself as requiring distortion correction. The MTF chart is thus a best case that is never achieved with distortion correction.

Image without distortion correction
f5.6 @ 1/6 sec, ISO 80; 2015-06-02 20:05:21
Sony A7R + Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8

[low-res image for bot]

Save the tax, we pay you back, instantly!
View all handpicked deals...

Dracast LED500 Plus Series Daylight LED Light
$600 $600
SAVE $0

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2019 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.