Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
Welcome to diglloyd.com
In-depth review coverage is by subscription.
Also by Lloyd: MacPerformanceGuide.com and WindInMyFace.com
First-time visitor
Memory Deals, Thunderbolt Drives, Performance Upgrades, and More
GET THE BEST DEALS
Top deals pages updated daily for Sony, Nikon, Canon, Apple, many more!
Instant rebates, Black Friday deals, etc
See also Holiday Head Start Deals and Shop Early Save Early
Shooting in Eastern Sierra ⛰ thru ~Dec 1st
Nov 19, 19:00 PST.
When feasible I descend for internet service most days, but…
Please expect up to 48 hour delay when subscribing.

Implications of Flange Focal Distance for Adapting Sony Mirrorless Lenses for the Canon Mirrorless RF-Mount and Nikon Mirrorless Z-Mount

See my Nikon Z wish list and Canon EOS R wishlist. (if not yet live, use this link to Canon EOS R system). PLEASE pre-order on September 12 using my links—thanks!

The flange focal distance (FFD aka backfocal distance) is the key factor in whether a lens design can be adapted to another camera mount. I mean “adapted” in a general sense, either inserting an actual lens adapter, or taking the same optical design and lengthening or shortening the lens barrel accordingly.

The shorter the flange focal distance on the target camera, the better, in terms of adapting lenses. Hence the Nikon Z-mount is by far the best possible mirrorless camera mount yet.

Since I shoot Zeiss Loxia and Zeiss Batis lenses exclusively on my Sony A7R III (when not testing), the most interesting question to me is this: which mount makes adapting Sony mirrorless lens designs easier? Of course there are many other 3rd-party lenses out there (Voigtlander, Venus Optics, Rokinon, Samyang, etc), so the question applies equally.

Flange focal distance for various camera mounts

   Nikon Z: 16mm <== most amenable to adapting lenses; greatest working room, 55mm diameter
   Canon R: 20mm <== Sony mirrorless designs would shortening by 2mm at the rear, 54mm diameter
Fujifilm X: 17.7mm
    Sony E: 18mm
   L-Mount: 19mm (Leica SL, L-mount Alliance, 51.6mm diameter)
     M 4/3: 19.25mm
Hasselblad XCD: 20mm
   Leica M: 27.8mm
  Canon EF: 44.0mms
   Nikon F: 46.5mm

How to think about the flange focal distance vs adapting a lens

Consider a Sony mirrorless lens with backfocal of 18.00mm. Its infinity focus lands 18.00mm from the flange, by definition.

Assume that lens can be glommed as-is onto the Nikon Z-mount. The backfocal distance of that mount is 16.0mm. But the lens focuses to infinity at 18mm—2mm behind the sensor. To rectify that, 2mm of distance must be added, e.g., by lengthening the lens barrel by 2mm.

Accounting for the difference

For the Nikon Z-mount system, the simplest fix is to insert a lens adapter. It would have to be 2.0mm thick which is quite thin and probably suitable only for small and light lenses, e.g., Zeiss Loxia. The 2.0mm thickness might not be feasible, though 2.5mm-thick lens adapters for Nikon F to Canon EF work very well.

For a lens manufacturer to deploy its optical designs on Nikon Z-mount (and assuming patents do not preclude that), the lens barrel would need to be lengthened appropriately, e.g., by 2.0mm for optical designs for Sony mirrorless. This is relatively easy to do. In fact Zeiss already does this with the Zeiss Touit line, which is available for both Fujifilm X and Sony E-mount—those mounts differ by 0.3mm.

For Canon RF-mount, a lens designed for the 18mm flange focal distance of Sony mirrorless would need to shorten the lens barrel by 2mm—often much harder in some cases since it can expose the rear lens element or other parts.

Compared to the Canon RF-mount, the Nikon Z-mount is far more friendly to adapting lenses designed for Sony mirrorless.

There may be lens designs in which shortening the barrel by 2mm at the rear is easy or with few mechanical issues (e.g., exposing the rear element). It might also be possible to recess the lens by 2mm into the throat of the Canon EOS R. But it’s just not as clean as adding 2mm of length. Pretty much a messy affair by comparison.

On the flip side, in theory if someone could build a 4mm-thick electronic lens adapter, then a Nikon Z7 lens could mount on the Canon EOS R. That might actually be possible since the lens adapters that I used for years to mount Nikon F lenses on Canon EF DSLRs was only 2.5mm thick.

Since I have all of the Zeiss Loxia lenses, I am hoping to see a simple mechanical lens adapter released that would allow mounting Zeiss Loxia on the Nikon Z7. It might lose EXIF info, but I can live with that. The only issue I see is that the adapter would need to be a somewhat awkward 46.1mm flange for the lens which expands to 55mm to mount on the Nikon Z7.

I don’t expect Zeiss to offer Zeiss Loxia or Zeiss Batis lens designs in native mount Canon RF or Nikon Z any time soon, and I don’t want to re-buy another set of lenses—large expense.

Meanwhile, I have no desire to shoot a 30 megapixel camera (Canon EOS R) when I can shoot 45 megapixels (Nikon Z7). So the Canon flange focal distance and the limited resolution that Canon offers make the Canon mirrorless system unappealing to me.

MacPerformanceGuide.com
B&H Deal ZoneDeals by Brand/Category/Savings
Deals expire in 8 hours unless noted. Certain deals may last longer.
$797 SAVE $350 = 30.0% $59 FREE ITEMS Nikon D5600 DSLR with 18-55mm and 70-300mm Lenses in Cameras: DSLR
$1099 SAVE $300 = 21.0% $249 FREE ITEMS Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO OS HSM in Lenses: DSLR
$3498 SAVE $1000 = 22.0% Sony a9 Mirrorless in Cameras: Mirrorless

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2008-2017 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.